Welcome Changes to Florida’s Patient Brokering Act

07 July 2020 Health Care Law Today Blog
Authors: Jana L. Kolarik

As previously reported in our August 16, 2019 and February 18, 2020 blogs, the Florida Patient Brokering Act (Florida PBA) was amended on July 1, 2019 to change the exception to the Florida PBA from conduct “not prohibited by” the Federal anti-kickback statute (AKS; 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)) or related regulatory safe harbors (42 C.F.R. § 1001.952) to conduct “expressly authorized by” the Federal AKS or related regulatory safe harbors.

As such, the new exemption language appeared to require that payment arrangements meet the federal AKS exceptions or related regulatory safe harbors. That change was significant because the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has stated that failure to meet a federal AKS safe harbor does not render a payment arrangement per se illegal and that determination as to whether the arrangement poses a risk of fraud and abuse using a totality of the “facts and circumstances” analysis is key. With the revised Florida PBA exception language, it was unclear whether the critical “facts and circumstances” analysis or even OIG guidance, upon which health care providers in Florida have historically heavily relied, was dependable in protecting arrangements in Florida.

In our prior February 2020 blog, we noted the need for a thoughtful rewrite of the Florida PBA that could involve the addition of language that states that, irrespective of the type of health care benefit program, conduct and/or payment arrangements that comply with an exception under, or otherwise do not violate, the federal AKS will not be an offense. We recognized that many arrangements can be structured to meet a federal AKS exception and safe harbor; however, there are some arrangements, e.g., percentage arrangements for sales agents or hourly arrangements for medical directors, which do not. Such arrangements that otherwise meet a “facts and circumstances” analysis under the federal AKS should not be deemed illegal under the Florida PBA.

We are happy to report that Florida passed CS/SB 1120, effective July 1, 2020, that changed the exception back to its original language at Florida Statutes section 817.505(3)(a), stating: “This section shall not apply to the following payment practices: (a) Any discount, payment, waiver of payment, or payment practice not prohibited by 42 U.S.C. s. 1320a-7b(b) or regulations promulgated thereunder.”

The Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018 (EKRA) is still causing confusion as reported in that same February 2020 blog, but the fix to the Florida PBA is welcome.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights