Staying Competitive and Compliant in the EU: 2013 Key Developments on Competition Matters
30 January 2014
Foley attorneys Howard W. Fogt and Sophie Lignier will be discussing the latest trends and developments in the EU’s competition law, including:
- Cartel: cartel enforcement and leniency in the EU; dawn raids procedure; agreements of minor importance
- Unilateral conduct: non-compliance with commitments decision; interplay between IP and competition law; standard essential patents (SEPs)
- Merger: simplifying merger procedures further; issue of minority shareholding; the interplay between EU and national merger control
- Distribution: RPM, MAP, and restrictions by object
- Private enforcement and implication for leniency applicants; impact of recent case law
There is no cost to participate in this program, but advance registration is required. To participate, please register here. Instructions for accessing the program will be included in the registration confirmation email.
Should you have additional questions, please contact Katie Egan at [email protected].
People
Related Insights
17 February 2025
Foley Viewpoints
6 Steps to Manage Tariff Risks in a Trade War
As Trump seeks to raise U.S. tariffs (which currently tend to be among the lowest worldwide), manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and other companies that frequently import must determine the best strategy to deal with the resulting uncertainties.
25 February 2025
Events
Navigating Tariffs and Supply Chain Contracts: Mitigating Financial and Legal Risks
Join Foley and Lardner LLP partners Greg Husisian, Leah Imbrogno, and Vanessa Miller on Tuesday, February 25, for a Strafford CLE webinar, “Navigating Tariffs and Supply Chain Contracts: Mitigating Financial and Legal Risks.”
17 February 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Navigating Non-Compete Agreements: Key Considerations for In-House Counsel in Franchise Businesses
In May of last year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought to ban non-compete agreements in most employment contracts. Franchise agreements were an exception. However, before the rule could take effect in September, a federal court vacated the ruling in August, asserting that the FTC lacked the authority to enforce such a regulation.