The event is specifically designed for non-accountants and will enhance understanding of business strategies, accounting fundamentals, and vocabulary used by management, investors, auditors, and bankers. Practical advice and applications of information to actual situations and financial reports will provide participants with opportunities to immediately implement growth and broaden capabilities.
Nicholson’s session, “Rise or Die: Financial Distress,” will focus on the following topics:
- Analyze the indicators and causes of financial distress, including solvency and liquidity
- Who are the stakeholders and other possibly affected parties?
- Evaluate restructuring alternatives, including when does a bankruptcy filing make sense?
- Rescue financing
- Case Study: Discuss a company in distress and strategies utilized to improve the situation
For more information and to register, please visit PLI’s website.
Related Insights
24 July 2025
Events
ACI's Inaugural Summit on GLP-1 Law & Policy
Foley partner Kyle Faget, co-chair of the firm’s Medical Devices Area of Focus, is speaking in American Conference Institute’s Inaugural Summit on GLP-1 Law & Policy on July 24.
23 April 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Company Should Know About…Tariff Strategies for Sell-Side Contracts
With the size and scope of President Trump’s tariffs continuing to shift, this is a critical time for businesses to assess their contracts and determine how increased tariff costs might adversely affect profitability, and whether there are any strategies to mitigate the losses.
22 April 2025
Health Care Law Today
Health Care Marketing: The Seventh Circuit Addresses “Referrals” Under The Anti-Kickback Statute
The case, United States v. Sorenson, addressed whether a Medicare-registered distributor violated the AKS in making payments to advertising, marketing, and manufacturing companies that worked to sell orthopedic braces to Medicare patients. The court held that such payments were not “referrals” within the meaning of the AKS because the payments were made to entities that were neither physicians in a position to refer their patients nor other decisionmakers in positions to “leverage fluid, informal power and influence” over health care decisions.