Why the Difference Between Risk and Hazard Matters for Nanotechnology
April 23, 2007
Scientific progress is a balancing act: Weigh the empirical evidence and determine the appropriate balance between allowing new technologies and protecting public health. Periodically however, development is obstructed by fear diminishing physical data. In this article, Mark Mansour discusses the idea that nanotechnology is poised to turn a bad trend of regulators, preferring to use “precautionary principles” to regulate based on means of production rather on the safety of the product, on its head and show the world that regulation based on empirical data, rather than on fear, provides the best hope for a safe future.
Copyright 2007 Small Times, PennWell Corp.
Copyright 2007 Small Times, PennWell Corp.
Related Insights
July 7, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Florida Bucks Trend, Enacts New Employer-Friendly Noncompete Statute
While the recent trend across the country has been to restrict noncompete agreements, Florida has just made it easier for employers to…
July 7, 2025
Health Care Law Today
DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group: Focus on Medicare Payment Suspensions
In a July 2, 2025, press release, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new “DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group” (the…
July 2, 2025
Energy Current
Has SCOTUS Pre-decided Whether the NRC Can License Private Off-Site High-Level Nuclear Waste Storage Facilities?
On June 18, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in NRC v. Texas, issued an opinion holding that the State of Texas did not have standing to…