On June 12, 2007, the protections associated with medical staff peer review information suffered another blow. In Adkins v. Christie, et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a state law granting a privilege for medical staff peer-review information does not apply in federal civil rights cases. The Court considered the issue, one of first impression in the circuit, and concurred with the Fourth and Seventh Circuits, which also have refused to recognize the privilege in federal civil rights cases.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Author(s)
Related Insights
April 29, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Tax the Rich: Additional States Considering and Enacting Taxes Targeting High-Net Worth Individuals
As predicted in the March 16, 2026, Foley Blog, a number of states recently moved to enact or propose income taxes aimed at individuals…
April 29, 2026
Innovative Technology Insights
From Static Compliance to Living Compliance: How Agentic AI Can Make Health Care Operations Safer
This piece was written in collaboration with Sam De Brouwer, co‑founder and CEO of XY.AI, and Lamara de Brouwer, co‑founder and CTO of…
April 29, 2026
Health Care Law Today Podcast
Episode 38: Let’s Talk Compliance: Not All wRVU’s are Created Equal (Part 1)
In this episode, Jana Kolarik, a partner in Foley’s Health Care Practice Group and Angie Caldwell, CFO and managing principal of PYA, discuss the importance of work relative value units (WRVUs) and fair market value (FMV) under the Stark Law and what this can mean for how health care organizations pay their physicians.