On June 12, 2007, the protections associated with medical staff peer review information suffered another blow. In Adkins v. Christie, et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a state law granting a privilege for medical staff peer-review information does not apply in federal civil rights cases. The Court considered the issue, one of first impression in the circuit, and concurred with the Fourth and Seventh Circuits, which also have refused to recognize the privilege in federal civil rights cases.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Author(s)
Related Insights
November 14, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Better Late Than Never: IRS Announces 2026 Retirement Plan Cost-of-Living Adjustments
On November 13, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Notice 2025-67, which contains the new dollar limitations for retirement…
November 14, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
No More 10% Retainage: California Mandates 5% Retention Cap on Private Construction Projects
Effective January 1, 2026: Time to Update Your Contracts If your firm is involved in private construction in California, a fundamental…
December 3, 2025
Events
Understanding Risks Associated with Social Media Advertising
As food and beverage companies increasingly rely on social media to build brand awareness and drive sales, its important to understand and assess risks associated with social media advertising and how to mitigate them.