Finding Synergy: How KSR v. Teleflex Will Affect Patent Prosecution in the Electrical and Mechanical Arts
August 26, 2008
In KSR International Co. v. Telejlex Inc, the Supreme Court held that the test for obviousness used by the Federal Circuit was inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. §103 and Supreme Court precedent. Specifically, the Court held that the Federal Circuit gave too much weight to the “teaching, suggestion and motivation” test (TSM) which requires a specific finding of some motivation, teaching, or suggestion to combine prior art teachings in the particular manner claimed before a claim may be found invalid.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
December 5, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Ninth Circuit Ruling Upholds Employee Speech Amid Stalled NLRB
Like it or not, social media has become the backdrop of almost everything we do. It's how many people read the news, interact with…
December 5, 2025
Legal News: International Trade Enforcement & Compliance
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Preserving the Right to IEEPA Tariff Refunds
Any company that has imported goods subject to the Trump administration’s fentanyl-based tariffs or reciprocal tariffs — i.e., the tariffs levied pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the IEEPA tariffs) — needs to consider filing an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to preserve the possibility of recovering refunds of these tariffs.
December 4, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…