Finding Synergy: How KSR v. Teleflex Will Affect Patent Prosecution in the Electrical and Mechanical Arts
August 26, 2008
In KSR International Co. v. Telejlex Inc, the Supreme Court held that the test for obviousness used by the Federal Circuit was inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. §103 and Supreme Court precedent. Specifically, the Court held that the Federal Circuit gave too much weight to the “teaching, suggestion and motivation” test (TSM) which requires a specific finding of some motivation, teaching, or suggestion to combine prior art teachings in the particular manner claimed before a claim may be found invalid.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
June 20, 2025
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Juneteenth Program: Exploring the Hidden History to Further Our Mutual Understanding
In celebration of Juneteenth, Foley & Lardner welcomed Dr. Deirdre Cooper Owens, author and historian, for a firmwide virtual program on…
June 20, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Federal Court Enjoins Former Franchisees and Two Related Entities from Competing Against Franchisor
A federal court recently granted in part and denied in part a franchisor’s motion to enjoin the post-termination activities of its former…
June 20, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Benefits Basics – When an Employee Becomes Disabled: A Resource Guide for HR & Benefits Professionals
Explore key considerations and plan-by-plan guidance for HR and benefits professionals navigating compensation and benefits issues when an employee becomes disabled.