Will Google Autocomplete have to be filtered to alter predictions in different countries, and even for various key words? Since Google’s Autocomplete predictions are based on relevant searches that users have conducted previously — and also related to Google+ profile information about individuals who are being searched — Google may have to find another way to predict results.
Can an automated Google feature that ostensibly helps users with a search be a basis for libel? Courts in Germany, Italy and Hong Kong have had to field that question.
Google’s position is that there is no human intervention, and that its algorithm is based merely on what others have searched
for, or strings of words in indexed pages.
Related Insights
27 May 2025
Events
The RIF Roadmap: Tools and Tactics for a Smooth and Compliant Transition
Join us for an insightful discussion on proactive workforce planning in today's dynamic economic and regulatory landscape.
16 May 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Reese’s Law: The Evolving Regulatory and Enforcement Landscape for Consumer Products Containing Button Cell or Coin Batteries
Over the past year, manufacturers, importers, distributors, and retailers of consumer products containing button cell and coin batteries (or products intended to contain them) have continued to adapt to the requirements of Reese’s Law and the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s corresponding enforcement efforts.
29 May 2025
Events
May 2025 Midwest Cyber Security Alliance Meeting | What Happens After a Breach: Practical Tips for the Notification Process
Join us on Thursday, May 29, 2025, at the next Midwest Cyber Security Alliance Meeting. Brandon Hollinder, Esq., and Adam Botter from Epiq will provide practical tips and insights on organizing the data mining and subsequent notification process after a cybersecurity breach.