Will Google Autocomplete have to be filtered to alter predictions in different countries, and even for various key words? Since Google’s Autocomplete predictions are based on relevant searches that users have conducted previously — and also related to Google+ profile information about individuals who are being searched — Google may have to find another way to predict results.
Can an automated Google feature that ostensibly helps users with a search be a basis for libel? Courts in Germany, Italy and Hong Kong have had to field that question.
Google’s position is that there is no human intervention, and that its algorithm is based merely on what others have searched
for, or strings of words in indexed pages.
Related Insights
15 October 2024
Health Care Law Today
Loper Bright False Claims Act Developments
In our July 15, 2024 post, we analyzed the Supreme Court’s landmark case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and the opportunities the decision might offer False Claims Act (FCA) defendants.
15 October 2024
Viewpoints
Non-Resident May Sue Under Minnesota Franchise Act, but Payment for Goods at Wholesale Prices Is Not a Franchise Fee
A non-resident of Minnesota can sue a manufacturer for violation of the Minnesota Franchise Act.
14 October 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Supreme Court Set to Determine Burden of Proof on Fair Labor Standards Act Exemptions
The U.S. Supreme Court has set oral argument for November 5, 2024, in E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera.