Foley Attorneys David T. Ralston, Jr. and Frank S. Murray, Jr. published a practice note in Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law. The note, “Government Contracts: Federal Procurement Protests,” provides an overview of federal agency, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and United States Court of Federal Claims bid protests that are brought by prospective bidders dissatisfied with the terms of a federal agency’s solicitation or by disappointed bidders seeking to challenge a federal agency’s contract award. The note includes a discussion of the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests compared to protests filed at the agency level and with the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 12, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Landmark Constitutional Challenge to False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provisions
On December 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical…
December 11, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Antitrust Risks and Compliance Strategies in Intellectual Property Portfolio Management
This article analyzes how intellectual property portfolio management can simultaneously promote innovation and present potential…
December 11, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
CARB Releases Proposed Regulations for SB 261 and 253
On December 9, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) released its proposed regulatory text for the initial regulations…