Attorney Jack Haake penned an article, “In Tronox, 2nd Circ. Sends Clear Message About Injunctions,” analyzing what the In re Tronox Inc., No. 16-343, (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) decision means for entities that don’t agree with how the court is evaluating their bankruptcy injunctions.
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Related Insights
June 20, 2025
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Juneteenth Program: Exploring the Hidden History to Further Our Mutual Understanding
In celebration of Juneteenth, Foley & Lardner welcomed Dr. Deirdre Cooper Owens, author and historian, for a firmwide virtual program on…
July 10, 2025
Events
Mandatory Roth Catch-up
Join Foley’s upcoming webinar on mandatory Roth catch-up contributions effective January 1, 2026. Learn how the new rules impact high earners, what guidance exists, and practical tips for plan compliance.
June 20, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Federal Court Enjoins Former Franchisees and Two Related Entities from Competing Against Franchisor
A federal court recently granted in part and denied in part a franchisor’s motion to enjoin the post-termination activities of its former…