Attorney Jack Haake penned an article, “In Tronox, 2nd Circ. Sends Clear Message About Injunctions,” analyzing what the In re Tronox Inc., No. 16-343, (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) decision means for entities that don’t agree with how the court is evaluating their bankruptcy injunctions.
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Related Insights
18 February 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Noncompete Bans – Next Up: Ohio
This month, Ohio joined the list of states with pending legislation to ban noncompetes. With the FTC noncompete ban blocked on a nationwide basis last year, Ohio lawmakers introduced a bill on February 5, 2025, that would ban noncompete contracts as a condition of employment in the state.
18 February 2025
DEA Delays Final Buprenorphine Rule
The Department of Health and Human Services and the Drug Enforcement Administration have delayed the effective date of the final rule regarding telemedicine prescribing of buprenorphine to March 21, 2025, and have requested public comments on the rule.
17 February 2025
Foley Viewpoints
6 Steps to Manage Tariff Risks in a Trade War
As Trump seeks to raise U.S. tariffs (which currently tend to be among the lowest worldwide), manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and other companies that frequently import must determine the best strategy to deal with the resulting uncertainties.