Attorney Jack Haake penned an article, “In Tronox, 2nd Circ. Sends Clear Message About Injunctions,” analyzing what the In re Tronox Inc., No. 16-343, (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) decision means for entities that don’t agree with how the court is evaluating their bankruptcy injunctions.
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Related Insights
July 23, 2025
Events
Healthcare Supply Chain Compliance Challenges: Vendor Management, Contract Negotiation, Tariff Impact
Foley partner Monica Chmielewski, vice chair of the firm’s Health Care Practice Group, is speaking in Strafford’s upcoming webinar titled “Healthcare Supply Chain Compliance Challenges: Vendor Management, Contract Negotiation, Tariff Impact” on July 23.
September 30, 2025
Events
FDA Regulation of AI-Enabled Medical Devices
Foley partner Kyle Faget, co-chair of the firm’s Medical Devices Area of Focus, is speaking at the American Bar Association Health Law Section’s Healthcare Delivery & Innovation Conference on September 30.
July 10, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
One Big Beautiful Bill Act Permanently Increases the Lifetime Estate, Gift and GST Tax Exclusion
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The OBBBA extended and may permanent many key…