New Florida Law Highlights Renewed Interest in Child Labor

Articles dealing with child labor often involve minors working in sweatshop-type conditions outside of the United States. The conditions outlined in such articles are usually horrid — and rightfully condemned. In contrast, employers in the U.S. probably give little thought to federal and state child labor laws, viewing the laws and compliance obligations as well-established.

Quietly, though, child labor laws in various U.S. states are changing. Particularly with lingering labor shortages and the approach of seasonal hiring for the summer, employers must be aware of these changes, which are primarily occurring at the state level.

According to a February 2024 article from Working Economics Blog, “child labor remains a top issue in 2024 state legislative sessions amid soaring violations and widespread abuse of child labor laws in multiple sectors of the economy.”

The state-level response has varied. Some states have strengthened protections, while other states have weakened child labor laws (mainly by allowing minors to work longer hours). Twenty-eight states have considered bills on this topic since 2021, with a near-equal mix of “strengthening” or “weakening” child labor protections.

Florida is a case in point of new laws allowing minors to work more hours. In its 2024 session, the Florida Legislature passed (and Governor DeSantis signed) House Bill 49, which takes effect on July 1, 2024. In addition to the actual changes in the law (which generally allow 16- and 17-year-old children to work more hours and expands the ability to work on school nights), the policy consideration behind the changes as well as the expected economic impact are notable. The House of Representatives Staff Final Bill Analysis identified the “direct economic impact on private sector” as follows:

The bill may increase opportunities for 16- and 17-year-old individuals to work and generate income.
The bill may allow certain employers to employ 16- and 17-year-old individuals without having to comply with the burdensome requirements in the current law.
The bill may increase labor force participation among 16- and 17-year-old individuals, which may result in a reduction of obtaining higher skills, education, and healthcare for these individuals.

Depending on the state, considerations like these may cause other jurisdictions to review or change their existing child labor laws.

What should an employer do now to comply with child labor laws?

First, remember that under federal law, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which applies throughout the country, establishes a general minimum age of 16 years for employment in nonhazardous occupations as well as a minimum age of 18 years for any employment in any occupation determined by the Secretary of Labor to be hazardous to the health or well-being of minors. The FLSA also specifies particular occupations where minors aged 14 and 15 are permitted to work.

Second, employers should take a current look at all states in which they have operations to ensure they are in compliance with applicable law and determine whether any changes have occurred at the state level. Employers should particularly look for any changes related to the number of hours a minor may work and for required rest and meal break periods within the workday.

While many of the recent changes allow for greater latitude in employing minors, the penalties for non-compliance remain stiff. If you employ or are considering employing minors, it is critical for you to take a close look at the current laws where you operate and to be aware of their possible impact.

Disclaimer

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.