Ferrante Dismisses Common Telemedicine-Cost Perceptions, Summarizes Senators’ Legislative Strategies
30 October 2017
MedPage Today
Attorney TJ Ferrante was quoted in a MedPage Today article, “Telehealth Advocates Push for Expanded Use,” discussing why the perception that telemedicine will raise Medicare costs is inaccurate, and explaining why senators are floating multiple telemedicine bills – rather than just one – around Congress.
On the high-costs perception, Ferrante explained: “In 2016, Medicare spent about $28.7 million on telehealth services, and that might be a big number, but when it’s put into perspective, the overall Medicare budget is about $600-plus billion, so that’s an infinitesimal drop in the bucket … A lot of the concern that telehealth is going to cause costs [to skyrocket] isn’t based in reality.”
In conversation about the multiple bills floating around Congress, including the CONNECT Act and the CHRONIC Care Act, Ferrante said, “I think the approach this year is that they weren’t sure if one bill with all these bells and whistles was going to pass, so let’s have five, six or seven different pieces of legislation [that might get attached to bigger bills].”
On the high-costs perception, Ferrante explained: “In 2016, Medicare spent about $28.7 million on telehealth services, and that might be a big number, but when it’s put into perspective, the overall Medicare budget is about $600-plus billion, so that’s an infinitesimal drop in the bucket … A lot of the concern that telehealth is going to cause costs [to skyrocket] isn’t based in reality.”
In conversation about the multiple bills floating around Congress, including the CONNECT Act and the CHRONIC Care Act, Ferrante said, “I think the approach this year is that they weren’t sure if one bill with all these bells and whistles was going to pass, so let’s have five, six or seven different pieces of legislation [that might get attached to bigger bills].”
People
Related News
06 February 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Panama Canal Discourse
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller commented in SupplyChainBrain article, "The Fight for Control of the Panama Canal," lending important context to the recent headlines over the important waterway.
06 February 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Weighs in on Suspension of De Minimis Trade Exemption
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian offered context on President Trump's recent trade actions on China in The Wall Street Journal article, "Why Trump Is Closing a Trade Exemption for China."
04 February 2025
In the News
Andrew Wronski on Tariff Fluidity – 'Keep on top of the issues'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Andrew Wronski assessed the evolving shift in U.S. trade policy in the Milwaukee Business Journal article, "Trump tariffs won't disappear — so how should Wisconsin businesses prepare?"