Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
December 15, 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition article, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
People
Related News
June 25, 2025
In the News
Jocelyn Lavallo Explores Nuclear's Emerging Role in Project Finance
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Jocelyn Lavallo examined the increasing relevance of advanced nuclear technologies in the evolving clean energy landscape in her Environment+Energy Leader article, "Nuclear’s Emerging Role in Project Finance: A Cross-Technology Perspective."
June 25, 2025
In the News
Foley Chairman Daljit Doogal Talks Strategic Growth, Expansion into Three New Markets on Podcast
Foley & Lardner LLP Chairman and CEO Daljit Doogal joined an episode of the On the Merits podcast with Bloomberg Law to tell the story of Foley’s successful strategic expansion into three emerging legal markets within the last four years.
June 24, 2025
In the News
Shaalu Mehra Shares His Tech Law Journey – 'I knew I wanted to be in technology'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Shaalu Mehra joined the HSU untied podcast to discuss his academic background, journey into law, and career path as a technology transactions attorney.