Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
December 15, 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition article, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
People
Related News
August 8, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian and David Simon Uncover the High Stakes of Tariff Evasion
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Gregory Husisian and David Simon are featured for their insights on how the U.S. government is cracking down on tariff evaders in the Newsweek article, "America Is Making Billions From Catching 'Tariff Cheaters.'"
August 7, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on Trump Pharma Tariffs
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget assessed the Trump administration's implementation of import tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry in the Pharma Life Sciences article, "Trump's pharma import tariffs threaten drug pricing, generics."
August 5, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui on Health Data Sharing Plan – 'I would expect the FTC to be heavily involved'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui addressed a new health care data sharing initiative announced by the federal government in the Bloomberg Law article, "Digital Data-Sharing Plan Tests Limits of Health Privacy Rules."