Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
December 15, 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition article, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
People
Related News
July 11, 2025
In the News
Foley Attorneys Assess Critical IP Considerations for Emerging Medical Device Companies
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys Shabbi Khan, Nate Beaver, Austin Kim, and Jeff Simon authored the Med Device Online article, "Critical Considerations For IP & Patents For Emerging Medical Device Companies."
July 11, 2025
In the News
David Morris Featured for Arrival to Foley's Salt Lake City Office
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Morris is highlighted across legal press for his recent arrival to the firm.
July 10, 2025
In the News
Ann Marie Uetz Comments on Automotive Supply Chain Approach to Evolving Tariff Environment
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Ann Marie Uetz shared perspective from the automotive supply chain amid the evolving trade environment in the Crain's Detroit article, "Ford, Stellantis tighten terms on suppliers as tariff costs add up."