Lacktman, Ferrante Discuss Proposed Legislation Aimed at Combatting Substance Abuse
05 March 2018
mHealthIntelligence
Partner Nate Lacktman and Senior Counsel Thomas Ferrante were quoted in an mHealthIntelligence article, “Congress Turns to Telemedicine to Take on Substance Abuse Epidemic,” about two bills pending in Congress that would ease restrictions on the prescribing of controlled substances to patients in telehealth-based drug treatment programs.
Lacktman and Ferrante said current federal law does not per se prohibit the use of telemedicine to prescribe controlled substances, and that a provider may do so if he or she has conducted at least one in-person exam of the patient or meets a ‘practice of telemedicine’ exception to the law’s in-person exam requirement. The problem, they said, is that the ‘practice of telemedicine’ exceptions in the law are very narrow, highly technical, and simply outdated.
“The practice of telemedicine has evolved exponentially in the decade since the [federal law] was passed, and the regulations fail to account for how legitimate telemedicine services are delivered today,” the pair said. “For that reason, the exceptions do not easily align with direct-to-patient service models frequently sought by patients in areas such as telepsychiatry or substance use disorder treatment. In addition, there is a nationwide shortage of psychiatrists and board certified substance abuse addiction specialists, coupled with the nation’s tragic opioid crisis, making telemedicine services an attractive resource.”
Lacktman and Ferrante’s quotes were sourced from their recent Health Care Law Today blog post, which can be found here.
Lacktman and Ferrante said current federal law does not per se prohibit the use of telemedicine to prescribe controlled substances, and that a provider may do so if he or she has conducted at least one in-person exam of the patient or meets a ‘practice of telemedicine’ exception to the law’s in-person exam requirement. The problem, they said, is that the ‘practice of telemedicine’ exceptions in the law are very narrow, highly technical, and simply outdated.
“The practice of telemedicine has evolved exponentially in the decade since the [federal law] was passed, and the regulations fail to account for how legitimate telemedicine services are delivered today,” the pair said. “For that reason, the exceptions do not easily align with direct-to-patient service models frequently sought by patients in areas such as telepsychiatry or substance use disorder treatment. In addition, there is a nationwide shortage of psychiatrists and board certified substance abuse addiction specialists, coupled with the nation’s tragic opioid crisis, making telemedicine services an attractive resource.”
Lacktman and Ferrante’s quotes were sourced from their recent Health Care Law Today blog post, which can be found here.
People
Related News
06 February 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Panama Canal Discourse
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller commented in SupplyChainBrain article, "The Fight for Control of the Panama Canal," lending important context to the recent headlines over the important waterway.
06 February 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Weighs in on Suspension of De Minimis Trade Exemption
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian offered context on President Trump's recent trade actions on China in The Wall Street Journal article, "Why Trump Is Closing a Trade Exemption for China."
04 February 2025
In the News
Andrew Wronski on Tariff Fluidity – 'Keep on top of the issues'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Andrew Wronski assessed the evolving shift in U.S. trade policy in the Milwaukee Business Journal article, "Trump tariffs won't disappear — so how should Wisconsin businesses prepare?"