Lacktman, Ferrante Discuss Proposed Legislation Aimed at Combatting Substance Abuse
05 March 2018
Partner Nate Lacktman and Senior Counsel Thomas Ferrante were quoted in an mHealthIntelligence article, “Congress Turns to Telemedicine to Take on Substance Abuse Epidemic,” about two bills pending in Congress that would ease restrictions on the prescribing of controlled substances to patients in telehealth-based drug treatment programs.
Lacktman and Ferrante said current federal law does not per se prohibit the use of telemedicine to prescribe controlled substances, and that a provider may do so if he or she has conducted at least one in-person exam of the patient or meets a ‘practice of telemedicine’ exception to the law’s in-person exam requirement. The problem, they said, is that the ‘practice of telemedicine’ exceptions in the law are very narrow, highly technical, and simply outdated.
“The practice of telemedicine has evolved exponentially in the decade since the [federal law] was passed, and the regulations fail to account for how legitimate telemedicine services are delivered today,” the pair said. “For that reason, the exceptions do not easily align with direct-to-patient service models frequently sought by patients in areas such as telepsychiatry or substance use disorder treatment. In addition, there is a nationwide shortage of psychiatrists and board certified substance abuse addiction specialists, coupled with the nation’s tragic opioid crisis, making telemedicine services an attractive resource.”
Lacktman and Ferrante’s quotes were sourced from their recent Health Care Law Today blog post, which can be found here.
Lacktman and Ferrante said current federal law does not per se prohibit the use of telemedicine to prescribe controlled substances, and that a provider may do so if he or she has conducted at least one in-person exam of the patient or meets a ‘practice of telemedicine’ exception to the law’s in-person exam requirement. The problem, they said, is that the ‘practice of telemedicine’ exceptions in the law are very narrow, highly technical, and simply outdated.
“The practice of telemedicine has evolved exponentially in the decade since the [federal law] was passed, and the regulations fail to account for how legitimate telemedicine services are delivered today,” the pair said. “For that reason, the exceptions do not easily align with direct-to-patient service models frequently sought by patients in areas such as telepsychiatry or substance use disorder treatment. In addition, there is a nationwide shortage of psychiatrists and board certified substance abuse addiction specialists, coupled with the nation’s tragic opioid crisis, making telemedicine services an attractive resource.”
Lacktman and Ferrante’s quotes were sourced from their recent Health Care Law Today blog post, which can be found here.
People
Related News
25 July 2024
In the News
Donald Schroeder on Groff – ‘Supreme Court decision is inviting a more fact-based analysis’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Donald Schroeder assessed the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in a religious accommodation case as it returns to the district court in the Law360 article, “A Year After High Court Spotlight, Groff Case Still A Bellwether.”
24 July 2024
In the News
Louis Lehot Featured in Q&A on How Startups Can Prepare for IPO
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Louis Lehot features in the Q&A, "How startups can get in top shape for an IPO, according to Silicon Valley lawyer Louis Lehot," part of Business Insider's Road to IPO' series.
24 July 2024
In the News
Courtenay Brinckerhoff on Patent Cap in Drug Pricing – ‘Hard to predict if this will make a difference’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff discussed a recent bill passed in the U.S. Senate aimed at lowering drug prices by limiting the number of patents that can be asserted in cases over biosimilars in the Law360 article, “Patent Cap In Drug Pricing Bill Seen As Having Muted Effect.”