Moskin Comments on Case Challenging Constitutionality of Ban on Registration for Offensive Trademarks
April 24, 2019
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
Partner Jonathan Moskin was quoted in a Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property article, “Justices question if ‘Fuct’ trademark merits First Amendment protection,” about a pending Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality of a statute prohibiting trademark registration for offensive trademarks.
Moskin noted a distinction between the statute’s prohibition of disparaging and scandalous marks. “Because the statutory provision does not bar offensive ideas, but merely how they are expressed, the statutory provision is more nearly viewpoint-neutral, and hence more likely to withstand scrutiny,” he said.
Moskin noted a distinction between the statute’s prohibition of disparaging and scandalous marks. “Because the statutory provision does not bar offensive ideas, but merely how they are expressed, the statutory provision is more nearly viewpoint-neutral, and hence more likely to withstand scrutiny,” he said.
People
Related News
July 2, 2025
In the News
John Strom and Peter Tomasi Quoted on Shift in Environmental Policy
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys John Strom and Peter Tomasi commented on changes to federal environmental rules in the Utility Dive article, "Federal agencies, including FERC and DOE, revoke environmental review rules."
June 30, 2025
In the News
Lynn Gandhi Assesses Midyear Takeaways from Major State and Local Tax Cases
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Lynn Gandhi is featured by Law360 for her takeaways on major state and local tax cases in the article, "Top State & Local Tax Cases Of 2025: Midyear Report."
June 27, 2025
In the News
Donald Schroeder Highlights FMCS Importance Amid Service's Uncertain Future
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Donald Schroeder described the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services' (FMCS) importance in the Law360 article, "As Feds' Bargaining Mediator Ails, New Services Emerge."