Moskin Comments on Case Challenging Constitutionality of Ban on Registration for Offensive Trademarks
April 24, 2019
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
Partner Jonathan Moskin was quoted in a Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property article, “Justices question if ‘Fuct’ trademark merits First Amendment protection,” about a pending Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality of a statute prohibiting trademark registration for offensive trademarks.
Moskin noted a distinction between the statute’s prohibition of disparaging and scandalous marks. “Because the statutory provision does not bar offensive ideas, but merely how they are expressed, the statutory provision is more nearly viewpoint-neutral, and hence more likely to withstand scrutiny,” he said.
Moskin noted a distinction between the statute’s prohibition of disparaging and scandalous marks. “Because the statutory provision does not bar offensive ideas, but merely how they are expressed, the statutory provision is more nearly viewpoint-neutral, and hence more likely to withstand scrutiny,” he said.
People
Related News
May 8, 2026
In the News
Shannon Goff Kukulka Highlighted Across Media for Foley Arrival
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Shannon Goff Kukulka is featured across media for her recent arrival to the firm's Nashville office.
May 4, 2026
In the News
James Lundy Assesses SEC Disgorgement Issues in Key Supreme Court Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner James Lundy assessed the U.S. Supreme Court’s consideration of SEC disgorgement powers in the Bloomberg Law article, “SEC Win on Core Enforcement Tool Would Still Leave Payback Gaps.”
May 1, 2026
In the News
Kathryn Trkla Shares Insights on Evolution of US Derivatives Law
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kathryn Trkla spoke to John Lothian News to share insights from co-authoring the latest edition of Derivatives Regulation, the leading authority on U.S. derivatives law.