Moskin Comments on Case Challenging Constitutionality of Ban on Registration for Offensive Trademarks
24 April 2019
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
Partner Jonathan Moskin was quoted in a Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property article, “Justices question if ‘Fuct’ trademark merits First Amendment protection,” about a pending Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality of a statute prohibiting trademark registration for offensive trademarks.
Moskin noted a distinction between the statute’s prohibition of disparaging and scandalous marks. “Because the statutory provision does not bar offensive ideas, but merely how they are expressed, the statutory provision is more nearly viewpoint-neutral, and hence more likely to withstand scrutiny,” he said.
Moskin noted a distinction between the statute’s prohibition of disparaging and scandalous marks. “Because the statutory provision does not bar offensive ideas, but merely how they are expressed, the statutory provision is more nearly viewpoint-neutral, and hence more likely to withstand scrutiny,” he said.
People
Related News
16 May 2025
In the News
Foley's East Coast Litigation Additions Highlighted in Legal Press
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Kenneth Breen, Phara Guberman, and Joseph Dowdy are featured across legal press for their recent move to the firm.
16 May 2025
In the News
Foley Attorneys Assess AI Use in Clinical Trials
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Monica Chmielewski and Kyle Faget shared insights on the growing adoption of artificial intelligence in clinical trials in the Clinical Trials Arena article, "Are regulators keeping pace with AI adoption in clinical trials?"
15 May 2025
In the News
Grace Fucci Publishes on Sustainability in Luxury Fashion
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Grace Fucci explores the intersection of luxury fashion and sustainability in The Global Legal Post article, "Can luxury fashion houses join the sustainability discussion?"