Lacktman, Wein and Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About New CMS Physician Fee Schedule for Telehealth Coverage
August 6, 2020
mHealth Intelligence
mHealth Intelligence cited a recent blog post written by Foley Partner Nathaniel Lacktman, Of Counsel Emily Wein and Senior Counsel T.J. Ferrante in the article, “How CMS Changes, Trump’s Executive Order Affect Telehealth Coverage,” which discussed how the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services long-anticipated plan to expand telehealth coverage beyond the current pandemic has now been made public.
An advance copy of the proposed 2021 Physician Fee Schedule contains several changes to current Medicare coverage, including highlighting new opportunities for remote patient monitoring and adding nine new billing codes for connected health services. Supporters say the changes offer providers a strong transition from the emergency measures now in effect to deal with COVID-19, while some have said the changes don’t go far enough to keep the momentum going.
“Compared to last year, where CMS made only minor additions to telehealth services, the changes proposed for 2021 are bold and designed to more deliberately expand the use of telehealth technologies among Medicare beneficiaries,” Lacktman, Wein and Ferrante wrote in a post on the firm’s health care blog.
CMS is expanding the telehealth platform to allow supervising physicians to now supervise via real-time, interactive, audio-visual telemedicine. The new definition opens opportunities for telehealth and incident-to billing,” the Foley team said. “CMS acknowledged there are no Medicare regulations that explicitly prohibit eligible distant site practitioners from billing for telehealth services provided incident-to their services. But because the current definition of direct supervision requires on-site presence of the billing clinician when the service is provided, it is difficult for a billing clinician to fulfill direct supervision of services provided via telehealth incident-to their professional services by auxiliary personnel. Under the new definition, CMS believes services provided incident to the professional services of an eligible distant site physician or practitioner could be reported when they meet direct supervision requirements at both the originating and distant site through the virtual presence of the billing physician or practitioner.”
Related News
July 18, 2025
In the News
Matt Caplan Featured for Arrival to Foley – 'It's an exciting time'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Matt Caplan is highlighted across press for his recent arrival to the firm's San Francisco office.
July 18, 2025
In the News
David Rosen on FDA's CRL Release – 'It hasn't happened in the past'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen commented on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's decision to publish a package of complete response letters to pharmaceutical companies in the PharmaVoice article, "Why FDA’s CRL release could open the door to lawsuits against pharma."
July 18, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui Highlights Potential Compliance Concerns in Pre-Tax Wellness Claims
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui commented in The New York Times article, "Hot Dogs for Insomnia? A Kennedy Aide's Start-Up Can Get You a Tax Break," sharing insight on the growing use of medical necessity letters to support tax-advantaged purchases of wellness products.