Many users have noticed that ChatGPT’s behavior has changed since its launch last November. This paper delves into how the platform’s responses to various prompts changed, some for good, some for worse. Its authors stress the need for LLM services to continually monitor the quality of their models.
Overall, our findings show that the behavior of the same LLM service can change substantially in a relatively short amount of time, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring of LLM quality.
View referenced article
Author(s)
Related Insights
June 10, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Government-Funded Inventions and iEdison
Inventions conceived or reduced to practice during the performance of work funded by the U.S. federal government are subject to various obligations under the Bayh-Dole Act. Fulfilling these obligations is important to maintaining ownership of such inventions and complying with the terms of government contracts.
June 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Texas Business Court Weighs In On Discoverability of AI Prompts
Share on Twitter
Print
Share by Email
Share
Back to top
The Texas Business Court has entered the growing national debate about whether conversations with AI tools like ChatGPT are discoverable, and it came down on the side of protection. In a minute entry filed June 3, 2026, Judge Grant Dorfman of the Eleventh Division ruled that a non-lawyer’s ChatGPT conversations, prepared in anticipation of litigation, can qualify as protected attorney work product under Texas procedural rules.
June 1, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
SEC Proposes Reforms to Filer Status Categories and Expanded Disclosure Accommodations
On May 19, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed rule amendments to revise the current five overlapping filer…