What Does “Manufacturing” Mean to You? The U.S. Government Wants to Know

01 June 2022 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog
Author(s): Frank S. Murray Jr

You probably know that the Buy American Act (BAA) establishes a preference, in procurements by U.S. government agencies, for the purchase of items manufactured in the United States. But did you know that the BAA contract clause does not itself define the phrase “manufactured in the United States?”  

Everyone agrees that the BAA’s domestic preference is meant to benefit U.S. manufacturers, but there is less consensus when it comes to defining just what operations must be performed in the United States to constitute domestic “manufacturing.” The Made in America Office of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has raised that lack of consensus in a recent Request for Information (RFI), seeking public comment on how the federal government should define the standards for domestic manufacture under the BAA.

For iron/steel items, many domestic preference requirements contain explicit instructions about what manufacturing processes must be performed in the United States: Every manufacturing process from the melt stage to the application of a protective coating. And, even for non-iron/steel items, there are certain minimal finishing operations, like packaging or painting, that plainly do not qualify as “manufacturing” of the underlying product. Consensus and clarity become harder to achieve, however, when attempting to identify whether the final, U.S.-based steps of a multi-stage manufacturing process are sufficiently significant to count as domestic “manufacturing,” as compared to the earlier stages performed in a foreign country. 

When a product has undergone significant processing outside the United States prior to arrival in the U.S. for final processing, the assessment of whether the U.S.-based processing is sufficient to constitute domestic “manufacturing” typically requires a fact-intensive analysis that evaluates the comparative time, complexity, and value of the processing operations performed in the U.S. and in foreign countries. The courts, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), and federal regulations have all articulated slightly different definitions or standards for what it means to “manufacture” an item, and OMB is now seeking feedback from the public on “the meaning of manufacturing for purposes of determining if an end product is manufactured in the United States.”

Manufacturers wanting to comment on OMB’s RFI and offer their suggestions on how to define manufacturing for the purposes of domestic preference requirements need to submit their comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal by Monday, June 6, 2022.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services