On June 12, 2007, the protections associated with medical staff peer review information suffered another blow. In Adkins v. Christie, et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a state law granting a privilege for medical staff peer-review information does not apply in federal civil rights cases. The Court considered the issue, one of first impression in the circuit, and concurred with the Fourth and Seventh Circuits, which also have refused to recognize the privilege in federal civil rights cases.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Author(s)
Related Insights
January 6, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Shifting Enforcement Priorities at the CFTC and the SEC
Under the new administration, priorities have shifted at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly with the enforcement divisions at both agencies — which had faced widespread internal and external criticism. Both the CFTC and SEC are undergoing structural changes as a shift away from regulation through enforcement. This article discusses these developments in detail.
January 5, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Fred Ridley showcased in Sports Business Journal’s “The 125 Most Influential in Sports Business of the Past 25 Years
Fred Ridley took over as chairman of Augusta National Golf Club in the fall of 2017, and in those short eight years, he has enacted…
January 5, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
New Year, New Rules for Applying for H-1B Visas
On December 23, 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a Final Rule to amend the process by which the government…