Jacquot Comments on State Opposition to Proposed Breach Notification Law
April 4, 2018
The Recorder
Partner Joseph Jacquot was quoted in an article in The Recorder, “Why Becerra and Other State AGs Are Panning Proposed Federal Breach Notification Law,” about some states’ fear that proposed federal legislation would restrict their ability to pursue enterprises that keep data security breaches hidden.
Since the bill would only require companies to notify consumers of a data breach that poses a “reasonable risk” of injury, states would no longer be able to go after companies in federal court solely on the basis of them keeping breaches secret, Jacquot said. Under current law, state attorneys general have the ability to prosecute breached companies “even if a consumer is not harmed or injured,” he added.
Jacquot cited the $18.5 million settlement Target paid to 47 states and the District of Columbia in 2017 over a 2013 data breach, which was used to pay for attorney’s fees, investigative costs and the enforcement of state consumer protection laws. Under the proposed act, states would not be able to band together to obtain such a settlement.
Since the bill would only require companies to notify consumers of a data breach that poses a “reasonable risk” of injury, states would no longer be able to go after companies in federal court solely on the basis of them keeping breaches secret, Jacquot said. Under current law, state attorneys general have the ability to prosecute breached companies “even if a consumer is not harmed or injured,” he added.
Jacquot cited the $18.5 million settlement Target paid to 47 states and the District of Columbia in 2017 over a 2013 data breach, which was used to pay for attorney’s fees, investigative costs and the enforcement of state consumer protection laws. Under the proposed act, states would not be able to band together to obtain such a settlement.
Related News
July 24, 2025
In the News
Foley's Trial Team Featured Following Landmark Victory in Texas Trade Secret Case
Foley & Lardner LLP’s recent landmark appellate victory in a Texas trade secrets case is featured in the Texas Lawyer article, "Ruling Sets Precedent for Employment, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duty."
July 24, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian and David Simon on Tariff Evasion – 'Huge money at stake'
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Gregory Husisian and David Simon detailed the rise and risks of tariff evasion in the POLITICO article, "As Trump raises tariffs, companies find ways to cheat — and risk getting caught."
July 23, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui on AI Scribes in Health Care – 'Technically, it's a third party listening'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui shared insights on the growing applications for artificial intelligence across health care in the healthleaders article, “Is Your AI Scribe HIPAA-Compliant?“