Partner Richard Stoll authored an article published in Bloomberg BNA: Daily Environment Report on May 16, 2014, titled “Protection of Judicial Review Watered Down in D.C. Circuit.” In the article Stoll highlighted the harsh results for regulated parties stemming from the recent ruling by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA. In that ruling, the court refused to entertain an industry challenge to a final rule provision that had not first been proposed, because the industry parties had not objected to the un-proposed rule provision during the public comment period. The final rule provisions thus remain in full force and effect. As Stoll commented, industry parties can now be punished for their “failures of telepathy and/or prophesy.”
Author(s)
Related Insights
July 7, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Florida Bucks Trend, Enacts New Employer-Friendly Noncompete Statute
While the recent trend across the country has been to restrict noncompete agreements, Florida has just made it easier for employers to…
July 7, 2025
Health Care Law Today
DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group: Focus on Medicare Payment Suspensions
In a July 2, 2025, press release, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new “DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group” (the…
July 2, 2025
Energy Current
Has SCOTUS Pre-decided Whether the NRC Can License Private Off-Site High-Level Nuclear Waste Storage Facilities?
On June 18, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in NRC v. Texas, issued an opinion holding that the State of Texas did not have standing to…