Guns, But No Bullets: California Supreme Court Limits Powers of Medical Staff Peer Review Hearing Officer in Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital & Medical Center
April 17, 2009
Shirley P. Morrigan and Nathaniel M. Lacktman analyze the recent California Supreme Court decision in the Mileikowsky case and offer advice for medical staff peer review bodies in light of the ruling.
Reprinted with permission from the American Health Lawyers Association. Article first appeared in the April 17, 2009 issue of Health Lawyers Weekly (Vol. VII, Issue 15).
Author(s)
Related Insights
May 30, 2025
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Mental Health Month Program: Enhancing Performance Through High-Quality Connections
Foley & Lardner endeavors to create a high-performance culture that also prioritizes well-being — a culture where every member of the…
May 29, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…
May 29, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Federal Fraud Statutes in Connection with False DBE Reporting on Federally Funded Projects
On May 22, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision in Kousisis v. United States, affirming a six-year prison sentence for a contractor convicted of federal wire fraud for misrepresenting use of a disadvantaged business enterprise supplier on a project.