Foley Successfully Represents Palomar in Patent Trial

08 October 2008 Media Contact: Jill Chanen News

Firm Obtains Rare Trial Victory in Plaintiff-Friendly Eastern District of Texas; Wins on Anticipation and Obviousness.

Foley client Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., a leading researcher and developer of light-based systems for cosmetic treatments, prevailed in a significant patent infringement suit on October 7, 2008, when a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found that the company’s products do not infringe Candela Corporation’s U.S. Patent No. 5,810,801 (“‘801 Patent”). In addition, the jury found that all of the claims at issue in ‘801 Patent were invalid over prior art, securing a rare defense victory in the Eastern District.

“We’re thrilled with the jury’s decision to invalidate all of Candela’s remaining claims in the case, based on both anticipation and obviousness,” said John Gutkoski, partner in Foley’s Intellectual Property Litigation and Emerging Technologies Practices and lead counsel for the Palomar case. “The Foley team worked tirelessly to ensure a positive outcome for Palomar in what generally is considered a plaintiff-friendly district, and we’re looking forward to continuing to guide the company through this matter to its conclusion.”

The victories came on the heels of several other successes for the firm during the case. Following favorable summary judgment decisions, just days before the start of trial Candela dropped from the lawsuit (i) its accusations against Palomar’s LuxY, LuxYs, and LuxG handpieces, (ii) two of its additional patents, specifically U.S. Patent Nos. 6,120,497 and 6,659,999, and (iii) all method claims in U.S. Patent 5,810,801.

Consequently, Candela went to trial on September 29th accusing Palomar’s Lux1540, Lux1540z, LuxIR and LuxDeepIR when used with the StarLux 300 or 500 of infringement of the remaining claims of U.S. Patent 5,810,801.

In addition to Gutkoski, who is based in the firm’s Boston office, Foley’s team was led by Debra Nye, senior counsel in its San Diego office and Michelle Flores, associate in the firm’s Boston office. The firm worked throughout the case and tried it with David Beck and his team from Beck, Redden, & Secrest LLP.

Foley & Lardner LLP continually evolves to meet the changing legal needs of our clients. Our team-based approach, proprietary client service technology, and practice depth enhance client relationships while seeing clients through their most complex legal challenges. The BTI Consulting Group (Wellesley, Massachusetts) recently recognized Foley as one of the top four law firms shaping the U.S. legal market, while CIO magazine has named Foley to its CIO 100 list six times for our client-focused technology. With more than 1,000 attorneys in 22 offices and more than 50 practices, Foley strives to provide high-caliber business and legal insight.

Related Services

Insights

New York Expands Pay Equity Law
22 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
The Face of DOL is New, the Name is Not; Trump Picks Scalia for Secretary of Labor
22 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ