Brinckerhoff Quoted on Mayo v. Prometheus

20 March 2012 Reuters News

Reuters

Discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus to reject two patents on a method for monitoring a patient’s blood to determine appropriate drug dosage as well as the decision's potential to affect the profitability of personalized medicine, Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff said the rejection is a disruption of the status quo that may result in less funding for research. First published in an article that appeared in Reuters, Ms. Brinckerhoff’s comments later appeared in additional publications including the Chicago Tribune, Yahoo! News, BioPortfolio and The Huffington Post.

Related Services

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ