Discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus to reject two patents on a method for monitoring a patient’s blood to determine appropriate drug dosage as well as the decision’s potential to affect the profitability of personalized medicine, Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff said the rejection is a disruption of the status quo that may result in less funding for research. First published in an article that appeared in Reuters, Ms. Brinckerhoff’s comments later appeared in additional publications including the Chicago Tribune, Yahoo! News, BioPortfolio and The Huffington Post.
People
Related News
July 24, 2025
In the News
Foley's Trial Team Featured Following Landmark Victory in Texas Trade Secret Case
Foley & Lardner LLP’s recent landmark appellate victory in a Texas trade secrets case is featured in the Texas Lawyer article, "Ruling Sets Precedent for Employment, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duty."
July 24, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian and David Simon on Tariff Evasion – 'Huge money at stake'
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Gregory Husisian and David Simon detailed the rise and risks of tariff evasion in the POLITICO article, "As Trump raises tariffs, companies find ways to cheat — and risk getting caught."
July 23, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui on AI Scribes in Health Care – 'Technically, it's a third party listening'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui shared insights on the growing applications for artificial intelligence across health care in the healthleaders article, “Is Your AI Scribe HIPAA-Compliant?“