Partner Mark Thimke was quoted in a Waste 360 article, “Legal Considerations Around Brownfield Remediation,” about state rules limiting liability for environmental cleanup projects.
Thimke said Wisconsin has established a brownfield liability exemption to promote redevelopment and address fears of legal consequences over environmental issues for developers and landfill owners who remediate a site in accordance with state law. “It’s the state saying, ‘We are confident about the condition of the site and are willing to take that risk over from the existing owner and developer,’” he said.
Thimke said Wisconsin has established a brownfield liability exemption to promote redevelopment and address fears of legal consequences over environmental issues for developers and landfill owners who remediate a site in accordance with state law. “It’s the state saying, ‘We are confident about the condition of the site and are willing to take that risk over from the existing owner and developer,’” he said.
People
Related News
February 20, 2026
In the News
Gregory Husisian Weighs in on Impact, Next Steps in Wake of SCOTUS Tariff Ruling
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian discussed the SCOTUS ruling that President Donald Trump improperly used the International Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs in the Milwaukee Business Journal article, “Southeast Wisconsin businesses brace for new trade hurdles after Supreme Court strikes down tariffs.”
February 19, 2026
In the News
Foley's California Growth, Four Partner Additions Garner Widespread Media Coverage
Foley & Lardner LLP's recent addition of partners Peter Stockburger, Matt Browne, Darby Chan, and Sanjeet Dutta — exemplifying the firm's continued strategic growth in California — garnered widespread media coverage.
February 19, 2026
In the News
Foley Attorneys Highlighted for Perspective on New PBM Transparency Rules
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Nick Welle, senior counsel Hannah Demsien, and associate Iris Grossman were highlighted in the BenefitPro article, “New federal law clashes with DOL proposal over who pays for PBM audits,” for their perspective on the conflict between the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) audit laws and draft Department of Labor (DOL) regulations.