Murray Quoted in Washington Business Journal About Amazon’s Protest of Cloud Computing Contract Award
26 November 2019
Washington Business Journal
Partner Frank Murray was quoted in a Washington Business Journal article, “Amazon’s JEDI protest relies heavily on Trump. But it might not get to argue that point,” about what evidence the Court of Federal Claims might consider in Amazon Web Services battle to overturn the Pentagon’s award of a $10 billion cloud-computing contract to arch-rival Microsoft. Amazon has argued that President Trump’s antipathy for Jeff Bezos was a factor in the award and wants to submit videos of Trump rallies into the record.
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
People
Related News
20 September 2024
In the News
David Rosen Featured for Insight on Looming FDA Final Rule for Cosmetic Manufacturing
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen is featured by CosmeticsDesign for his insights on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's final rule establishing Good Manufacturing Practices for the cosmetics industry in the article, "Preparing for MoCRA’s 2025 cGMP deadline: What cosmetic manufacturers and suppliers need to know."
19 September 2024
In the News
Patrick Daugherty on UChicago's Desk Reference for Crypto, Web3 – 'This is very much for lawyers'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Patrick Daugherty commented on the University of Chicago Law School's recently released open-access legal desk reference on crypto and Web3 matters in the Law.com article, "UChicago Law Professors Release Desk Reference Breaking Down Crypto, Web 3 for Attorneys."
18 September 2024
In the News
Eli Mazour Talks Patents on IPWatchdog Unleashed Podcast
Foley & Lardner of counsel Eli Mazour appeared on the IPWatchdog Unleashed podcast episode, "Problems, Solutions and the Case for Patents," to discuss patents and innovation, the Federal Circuit, the value of patents to clients, and patent strategy.