Defying Senate, President Obama purportedly makes recess appointment of Cordray to lead CFPB

04 January 2012 Consumer Class Defense Counsel Blog

For nearly six months, President Obama’s nomination of Richard Cordray to be the first Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) has been blocked by Senate Republicans. Today, the President is attempting to call the Senate’s bluff by making a legally questionable recess appointment of Cordray.

Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 3 of the federal Constitution, the President is empowered to make appointments to fill vacancies while the Senate is in recess. These so-called “recess appointments” have a limited duration, expiring when the next session of Congress ends, so Cordray’s appointment would not be effective for the full five-year term contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Act unless he were renominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

There is a real constitutional question whether the Senate is, in fact, in “recess” and whether President Obama’s appointment of Cordray is valid. In attempting to block President Obama from making recess appointments (and, in particular, an appointment of Cordray), the House of Representatives has purported to remain in session, holding “pro forma” sessions every few days in which few members of the House are present and which last literally seconds or minutes. Due to the requirements of Article I, Section 5, Clause 4 of the Constitution, the Senate is unable to adjourn for more than three days without the consent of the House, and the current Republican-controlled House has forced the Democrat-controlled Senate leadership to remain officially in session and to hold similar pro forma sessions every few days. 

Much more is at stake than a high-profile leadership appointment for Cordray. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB lacks supervisory and enforcement jurisdiction over nondepository institutions until a director is in place. With very few exceptions, Congressional Republicans have never been supporters of Dodd-Frank or, in particular, the CFPB and its broad jurisdiction and consumer protection mandate, and they have used their leverage over the appointment of a director to forcefully advocate for major structural changes in the CFPB. 

It now seems likely that Cordray’s recess appointment, as well as attempted supervision and enforcement actions by the CFPB for nondepository institutions, may be challenged soon in federal court. Stay tuned: this saga is far from over.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services