You Might Soon Have New Ammunition in Your Efforts to Combat Trade Secret Theft

03 August 2012 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

If three Democratic senators have their way, some companies may soon be able to protect their valuable trade secret information under federal law. On July 17, 2012, senators from Wisconsin, Delaware, and Rhode Island introduced a bill, the Protecting American Trade Secrets and Innovation Act of 2012 that would allow companies that face certain kinds of trade secret theft to bring suit in federal court.Currently, employers cannot bring a federal civil claim for trade secret theft and are instead limited to pursuing such claims under state laws, which vary from state to state. This situation can present logistical difficulties and enforcement problems, especially for companies operating in multiple states and/or dealing with international trade secret theft. Limiting language in the bill indicates that it is designed to remedy just such complications.

Not every claim related to trade secret theft can be brought under federal law under the Act. Instead, the Act requires that companies bringing a federal trade secret civil action swear that the dispute in question “involves either substantial need for nationwide service of process or the misappropriation of trade secrets from the United States to another country.” While this limiting language means that there is only a narrow scope of trade secret thefts that could result in federal claims, it would still serve as a welcome new avenue for redress for companies in certain situations.

The senators introducing the bill feel it is necessary to fully protect companies from damaging trade secret theft. For example, bill sponsor Senator Kohl stated, “We cannot take lightly the threat of trade secret theft to American businesses, American jobs, and American innovation. This legislation is another simple and straightforward step we can take to help companies defend themselves against trade secret theft. It demonstrates our commitment at the federal level to protect all forms of a business’ intellectual property and their innovative spirit.” Senator Coons, another sponsor, echoed these sentiments: “When a company’s trade secrets are stolen, the company loses its competitive edge and the jobs of its employees are threatened. We must do all we can to ensure that American innovators are able to protect themselves from economic espionage. The Protecting American Trade Secrets and Innovation Act would establish a strong and uniform federal civil remedy for companies that deal in trade secrets to recover for their theft. It is my hope that the Senate takes up this bill for consideration and sends a clear signal that we will not sit idly by while American companies’ ideas are stolen.”

Visit http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3389 to track the progress of this bill and stay tuned for updates from Foley. For additional information on trade secret and noncompete issues, please go to http://www.foley.com/trade-secret-noncompete-litigation/.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Does The U.S. Need STRONGER Patents?
16 July 2019
PTAB Trial Insights
California Establishes Fund to Combat Wildfire Threats
15 July 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
There’s No Place Like Home – But Is That a Reasonable Accommodation?
15 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ