Bank Sued Over "Unfair" and "Deceptive" Overdraft Fees

24 December 2012 Consumer Class Defense Counsel Blog

A large bank was sued in federal court in New York last week by a putative nationwide class alleging that the bank engaged in “unfair, deceptive, and unconscionable assessment and collection of excessive overdraft fees.” 

The complaint accuses HSBC Bank and other companies of manipulating the order of customers’ debit card transactions to maximize overdraft penalties by depleting the customer’s account faster with larger transactions and then charging multiple overdraft fees on smaller transactions that were actually made when the account had sufficient funds to cover those purchases. The compliant also accuses HSBC of failing to advise its debit card customers that they have the right to “opt out” of HSBC’s overdraft program, as required by Federal Reserve, and alleges that HSBC could have simply declined to process a debit or point-of-sale transaction when a customer had insufficient funds to cover the purchase or could have warned the customer that he or she was about to overdraw their account. 

Now is a good time to review some of the available regulatory guidance on overdraft protection programs, including that provided by the FDIC and the Department of the Treasury. These agencies have suggested certain practices with respect to overdraft programs, including: 1) informing customers of different ways to handle overdrafts, such as lines of credit or automatic transfers, that would avoid overdraft fees; 2) educating customers about choices they have with respect to overdrafts and giving them an opportunity to “opt-out” before the overdraft program is implemented; 3) monitoring customer activity to track customers who incur multiple overdrafts and educating them about the costs and alternatives to overdrafting; 4) communicating frequently with customers to ensure their understanding of the program.

The HSBC suit is yet another warning to banks against aggressive marketing campaigns. As we know from the Bureau’s credit card settlements this past summer and its recent warning to mortgage lenders, marketing practices are under scrutiny – now is the time to review your procedures!

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights