Another Steelmaker Subsidiary Raided in International Antitrust Investigation

16 April 2013 Dashboard Insights Blog

On March 29, 2013, South Korea’s antitrust watchdog, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office raided the office of POSCO ICT, a subsidiary of POSCO that manages the parent company’s IT network, as part of an ongoing investigation of South Korea’s biggest steelmakers. Approximately 10 investigators conducted the search and seizure, which included collection of e-mail archives, internal reports and transaction documents. A representative for the law enforcement agency indicated that the raid was conducted to secure certain data and that it currently had no plans to raid additional companies.

That said, this raid follows a probe initiated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of several steel producers for alleged price fixing of galvanized sheet iron, color steel sheets, and cold-rolled plates. Last year, the Fair Trade Commission alleged that the steel companies regularly had meetings to collude with each other on prices for these products. The FTC also alleged that Dongbu, the largest supplier, increased it prices first and the others followed and that this price increase indicated a pattern of price fixing. In December 2012, South Korea’s Supreme Prosecutors’ Office fined several of these steel producers, including Posco C&C, Hyundai Hysco, Dongbu, SeAH Steel and Union Steel, a combined fine of $291.7 billion. The FTC had investigated these entities since 2009 and has been investigating the steel industry since as early as 2005.

Just one month ago, Germany’s Federal Cartel Office (“GFCO”) raided the offices of three steelmakers, Voestalpine, ThyssenKrupp, and ArcelorMittal, as part of its antitrust investigation into illegal price agreements between steel suppliers in the automotive industry.

The announcement of these raids demonstrates the ongoing nature of these investigations and the ability law enforcement agencies around the world have to leverage and coordinate their antitrust investigation with other global agencies.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Does The U.S. Need STRONGER Patents?
16 July 2019
PTAB Trial Insights
California Establishes Fund to Combat Wildfire Threats
15 July 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
There’s No Place Like Home – But Is That a Reasonable Accommodation?
15 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ