California Transparency in Supply Chains Act

18 April 2013 Dashboard Insights Blog

As of last year, the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act requires qualifying businesses to disclose their efforts to eradicate human trafficking and slavery from their direct supply chains.

Which Business Qualify Under the Act
Under the Act, all retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in California with annual worldwide gross receipts exceeding $100 million are required to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their global supply chain.

Who Is a “Retail Seller”?
A business entity with retail trade as its principal business activity code, as reported on the entity’s tax return.

Who Is a “Manufacturer”?
A business entity with manufacturing as its principal business activity code, as reported on the entity’s tax return.

What Does “Doing Business” Mean?
A company is deemed to be “doing business” in California if: (1) the company is organized or commercially domiciled in California; (2) sales in California for the applicable tax year exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 25 percent of the company’s total sales; (3) the real property and the tangible personal property of the company in California exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 25 percent of the company’s total real property and tangible property; or (4) the amount paid in California by the company for compensation exceeds the lesser of $50,000 or 25 percent of the total compensation paid by the company.

What Do Qualifying Companies Need To Do?
A qualifying company must post on the homepage of their Website to what extent (if any), the company does in each of the following five categories.

i. verifying product supply chains to evaluate and address risks of human;

ii. trafficking and slavery (and disclosing whether the verification was not conducted by a third party);

iii. auditing suppliers to evaluate their compliance with company standards for human trafficking and slavery in supply chains (and disclosing whether the verification was not an independent, unannounced audit);

iv. requiring direct suppliers to certify that materials incorporated in the product comply with the laws regarding human trafficking and slavery of the country or countries in which the suppliers are doing business;

v. maintaining internal accountability standards and procedures for employees or contractors failing to meet company standards regarding human trafficking and slavery; and

vi. training company employees and managers, who have direct responsibility for supply chain management, on human trafficking and slavery, particularly on mitigating such risks within supply chains of products.

If the company does not have a Website, the company must provide a written disclosure to a consumer within thirty (30) days of a written request.

What About Non-California Businesses?
Similar federal legislation may be looming. For example, Congress introduced the Business Transparency on Trafficking and Slavery Act in 2011. Unlike the California Act, the proposed federal legislation would apply to any publicly traded or private company (with receipts exceeding $100 million) currently required to submit annual reports to the SEC.

Although the federal legislation or similar federal legislation has yet to pass, non-California businesses should begin considering the possibility that they could become subject to such legislation if, or when, passed.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Bad Holiday Season News! Estimates of an increase of Cyberattacks 20%!
13 December 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Driving the Future of Automotive Technology
12 December 2019
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Massachusetts Governor Proposes Facility Fee Ban
12 December 2019
Health Care Law Today
American Rule Prevails; PTO May Not Collect In-House Attorneys' Fees as "Expenses"
12 December 2019
IP Litigation Current
ACCC 46th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit
04-05 March 2020
Washington, D.C.
Foley/Deloitte Compliance and Privacy Officer Roundtable
27 February 2020
Boston, MA
Let’s Talk Compliance
24 January 2020
Orlando, FL
New England Alliance Annual Meeting
15-17 January 2020
Woodstock, VT