Don't Ask Me If I'm Unemployed, or I'll Sue You

20 December 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

Several years ago, we reported about attempts by Congress to pass a law prohibiting employers and employment agencies from refusing to consider job applicants solely because they were unemployed. While no federal law has materialized, several cities and states have passed laws since then adding the unemployed as a protected class under their equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws.

Earlier in 2013, New York City passed a detailed law banning discrimination on unemployment status. The New York City law does allow employers to consider an applicant’s unemployment status when there is a “substantially job-related reason” and to ask about the circumstances surrounding an applicant’s separation from employment. It also allows employers to determine that only current employees of the employer will be considered for employment in a certain position or given priority in hiring.

More recently this month, Madison, Wisconsin passed a similar law, that simply added “unemployment” as a protected category, without listing any of the exceptions set out specifically in the New York law. In some other states and locales, including Chicago, New Jersey and Oregon, laws have passed barring employers from placing ads stating that the unemployed cannot apply, but they have not added unemployment as a protected category.

As more and more states and cities ban discrimination against the unemployed, here are some tips you can follow:

  • Review ads for new hires to make sure they do not expressly exclude the unemployed;
  • Add “unemployment status” to the list of protected categories in your EEO and anti-retaliation policies;
  • Review any specific exceptions to bans on advertising related to the unemployed or discriminating against the unemployed;
  • Train hiring supervisors and other employees involved in the hiring process not to ask applicants if they are unemployed, just as they don’t ask them if they are married or which church they go to.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Insights

The DOL Tries to Say Goodbye—And Seriously, We Mean It—to the 80/20 Rule for Tipped Employees
21 October 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
To Stalk or Not to Stalk . . . That Is the Question – Using Social Media for Applicant Review
21 October 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
New Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Updates Seeks Examination Predictability
21 October 2019
Legal News: Intellectual Property
Cryptocurrency in China is like BIG BROTHER in 1984!
20 October 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.