Non-U.S. Companies Struggle to Implement U.S.-Style Document Retention Policies

20 March 2014 Dashboard Insights Blog

Many of us in the U.S. legal community know that developing and implementing a defensible document retention policy is important, if not crucial, to a company’s data management. It can speed up the procedures in, or reduce the costs associated with document preservation and document production.

This common understanding, however, is often times not understood well enough by non-U.S. companies. Except for truly global companies that have plenty of experience in U.S. litigation, many non-U.S. companies do not know how broad and burdensome the discovery process can be. Similarly, many of them do not know that there is an obligation to preserve relevant documents pre-litigation. Accordingly, they are not always fully aware of the importance of a defensible document retention policy.

Our experience with Japanese companies has been that many of them do not have “U.S.-style” document retention policies, that is, document retention policies that are intended to be defensible in U.S. litigation. Those companies usually have document retention policies that have been developed in the past in accordance with their home country standards. Furthermore, some of the practices in Japanese companies become obstacles when trying to implement U.S.-style, company-wide document retention policies. For example, it is not uncommon for each business department to have its own information system or its own encryption method.

This gap between U.S.-style document retention policies and Japanese-style practices was one of the focuses when we spoke at a recent seminar titled “Laws and Practices of E-Discovery 2014”. The seminar, sponsored by Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory Co., Ltd, was held in Tokyo, Japan to an audience of mainly Japanese companies doing business in the U.S.  At this seminar, we emphasized how important it is to develop and implement a U.S.-style document retention policy, should a company foresee a reasonable possibility of becoming involved in U.S. litigation. Through the many questions raised during the Q&A session, we felt the growing interest on this topic.

More and more non-U.S. companies are starting to re-examine their document retention policies. They do not want to be disadvantaged in U.S. courts, just because they had “non-U.S.-style” policies. Just as much as a U.S. company – or even more so – it will take careful preparation and extra effort for a non-U.S. company to develop and implement a defensible “U.S.-style” document retention policy.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services