The Impact of Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp.: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms That Business Judgment Review Applies to Properly Structured Controlling Stockholder Buyouts

25 March 2014 Publication
Authors: Gardner F. Davis

Legal News Alert: Transactional & Securities

In Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp.,1 the Delaware Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Court of Chancery’s decision that the more deferential business judgment rule standard of review, rather than an entire fairness standard of review, applies to controlling stockholder buyouts if merger discussions are conditioned up front on both the negotiation and approval of an empowered independent committee and an uncoerced, fully informed, majority-of-the-minority stockholder vote.

The Delaware Supreme Court recognized that the historical, more intrusive, “entire fairness” standard of review imposed a substantial unnecessary litigation burden on defendant directors and the controlling stockholder without any practical benefit to minority investors. Under the new standard, if the process is properly structured, the defendants should win dismissal of shareholder lawsuits without expensive and time-consuming discovery regarding the financial fairness of the deal. If the sale process is sufficient from a procedural perspective to invoke the new business judgment standard, the claims against the defendant directors and controlling shareholder must be dismissed unless no rational person could have believed that the merger was favorable to the minority stockholders.

Under the new standard, the business judgment standard of review will be applied if and only if:

  1. The controlling stockholder conditions the procession of the transaction on the approval of both a special committee and a majority of the minority stockholders;
  2. The special committee is independent;
  3. The special committee is empowered to freely select its own advisors and to say no definitively;
  4. The special committee meets its duty of care in negotiating a fair price;
  5. The vote of the minority is informed; and
  6. There is no coercion of the minority stockholders.

 

If any of these conditions are not established, the historical entire fairness standard of review will continue to apply.


1 Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp., 2014 WL 996270 (Del. March 14, 2014).


Legal News Alert is part of our ongoing commitment to providing up-to-the-minute information about pressing concerns or industry issues affecting our clients and colleagues. If you have any questions about this update or would like to discuss the topic further, please contact your Foley attorney or the following:

Gardner Davis
Jacksonville, Florida
904.359.8726
gdavis@foley.com

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.