You Posted My Medical Information on Facebook?!?!?

07 July 2014 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment. An employer is required to make a reasonable accommodation to an employee’s known disability if it would not impose an undue hardship on the employer’s business. In the course of exploring an employee’s limitations to consider possible accommodations, employers routinely obtain employees’ medical information as part of the interactive process the ADA requires. However, the ADA also mandates that employers keep employee medical information confidential and protect it from disclosure. Specifically, it requires that any information relating to a medical condition of an employee obtained through employment related medical examination and inquiries must be treated as a confidential medical record. A recent case illustrates the challenges this obligation can create (and the baffling things employees sometimes do…).

In the recent matter, the court determined a company may be liable to an employee whose confidential medical information was disclosed on another employee’s Facebook page. The situation began when an employee spent several months away from work recovering from a workplace injury. The company employee responsible for processing workers compensation claims prepared an accident report regarding the injury and alerted the insurance carrier. Through the course of monitoring the injured employee’s medical treatment, the company employee became aware of nature and extent of the injury.

Unfortunately, the company employee handling the workers compensation claim posted the following on her Facebook page, “Isn’t [it] amazing how Jimmy experienced a 5 way heart bypass just one month ago and is back to work , especially when you consider George Shoun’s shoulder injury kept him away from work for 11 months and now he is trying to sue us.” The injured employee proceeded to sue his employer for violating the ADA’s confidentiality provision, asserting that the Facebook post was a deliberate disclosure of his medical record and had caused prospective employers not to hire him. The court rejected the employer’s attempt to have the claim dismissed because the injured employee had publically disclosed his medical condition and allowed the claim to proceed against the employer. That employer must now defend against the substantive allegations in the lawsuit.

Employers must pay close attention to how employee medical information is obtained, how it is stored, and who has access to the information. In order to ensure the confidentiality of employee medical information is protected, employers should have clear policies and train employees regarding the importance of keeping the information confidential. In previous issues, we have warned employers of the National Labor Relations Board’s negative view of overly restrictive social media policies, such that there could be an understandable hesitance to impose restrictions on anything employee’s post on social media these days. However, employers also have the right – and the obligation – to protect truly confidential information such as trade secrets and employee medical information. A simple prohibition against any disclosure of confidential medical information, including through social media, will help employers avoid claims for violation of the ADA’s confidentiality requirements.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA