Ban-the-Box Bandwagon Requires Application Review

15 September 2014 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

On August 11, 2014, New Jersey joined Illinois and at least 11 other states, as well as dozens of cities and local governments, in prohibiting most employers from initially asking about criminal history on job applications. This follows the EEOC’s scrutiny of the use of criminal convictions in the hiring process. As “ban-the-box” increasingly becomes a national initiative, and because states frequently play follow-the-leader with respect to this type of legislation, employers should expect similar legislation to spread to other jurisdictions.

As a consequence, employers would be wise to evaluate whether a criminal history inquiry should be removed from their applications. An employer operating in any of the states or localities with ban-the-box legislation needs to eliminate the question from the application. In the wake of the ban-the-box trend, some national employers have decided to eliminate the criminal history question across-the-board, even in those states that do not (yet) have the prohibition. Smaller employers in a state not yet affected have the choice of whether to continue to monitor the legal environment or use other methods than the application to protect their interests.

While there is merit to the argument that a criminal history should not operate to exclude all applicants, employers also have valid reasons for considering criminal history and in some industries, such as in the financial industry, unique laws and regulations actually require employers to do so. In fact, the New Jersey law and others carve out an exception to the ban when federal or state laws or regulations require the consideration of criminal history. Even the EEOC and the ban-the-box states recognize in some situations a criminal history is a legitimate concern, so long as there is an individualized inquiry and applicants are not automatically screened out because of such history. Avoiding the risks of a negligent hiring claim is another legitimate consideration for why an employer would want to inquire into criminal history and find a way to do so without automatically screening out applicants with such history.

To accomplish these objectives, one possible option would be to ask about criminal history post-application, during the job interview, and allowing the applicant to explain why it does not impact his/her qualifications, or making the inquiry after a conditional offer of employment has been made. Then the employer should analyze other factors such as the date and type of conviction as well as the requirements and sensitivity of the job.

Given these ban-the-box and other laws impacting job applications, now is a good time to review your applications. If you do not, expect that a government agency or plaintiff’s attorney may do so in the future under less opportune circumstances.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.