The Creeping Union Part I: Could a “Micro-Union” Happen to You?

12 September 2014 Innovative Technology Insights Blog

Is it ever too early for a startup business to consider the potential impact of unionized labor on future operations? According to a line of cases stemming from a groundbreaking 2011 National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision, the answer is “no.” In fact, as explained below, the early stages of a company’s life may be the perfect time to consider whether the company has or may have a “micro union” constituency that could impact future business decisions. 

Specialty Healthcare

In 2011, Specialty Healthcare addressed the question of how narrowly a group of employees may define a given bargaining unit, and many have credited the decision for drastically expanding the ability of employees to unionize. In that case, a group of 53 certified nursing assistants (CNAs) working at a nursing home sought to form a bargaining unit. The employer contended that the group of 53 CNAs was too narrow, and that the only appropriate bargaining unit which could organize was a bargaining unit comprised of 86 employees, including the CNAs and other service and maintenance employees.

In deciding that the group of CNAs was, in fact, an appropriate bargaining unit, Specialty Healthcare articulated a “community of interest” test, which looks to whether:

  • The employees are organized into a separate department
  • Have distinct skills and training
  • Have distinct job functions and perform distinct work, including inquiry into the amount and type of job overlap between the employer’s other employees
  • Have frequent contact with other employees
  • Interchange with other employees
  • Have distinct terms and conditions of employment
  • Are separately supervised

Applying this approach, the NLRB noted that “a proposed unit need only be an appropriate unit and need not be the only or the most appropriate unit….” By contrast, “the proponent of a larger unit” must demonstrate that employees in the encompassing unit share “an overwhelming community of interest” such that there “is no legitimate basis upon which to exclude certain employees from it.”

Some feared that Specialty Healthcare would lead to a vast expansion of unionization by allowing smaller units to be formed where previously a community of interest had been unable to take hold. Most worrisome, was the possibility that there could be many different bargaining units formed within a labor force, making it nearly impossible for an employer to contend with them all.

In Part II, we will review two recent cases since Specialty Healthcare and what those decisions mean for your startup.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.