Malcolm Gladwell Re-Thinks Automotive Safety in "The New Yorker"

26 May 2015 Dashboard Insights Blog

Recent high-profile product liability lawsuits against automotive manufacturers have captured national attention. These cases have led to a renewed and heightened focus on automotive safety and, specifically, the guidelines and procedures used by automotive manufactures to determine whether to initiate a recall.

Malcolm Gladwell explores this topic in-depth in an article entitled “The Engineer’s Lament,” appearing in the May 4, 2015 issue of The New Yorker. Gladwell interviews Denny Gioia, a former Ford Motor Company engineer who worked in the company’s recall department during the 1970s. Gioia explains the difficulties encountered by engineers in investigating field reports of accidents or malfunctions and attempting to determine whether there are patterns in the data that would suggest a defective part – a “traceable cause.” Gioia and his fellow engineers at Ford would often struggle to ask themselves, “When do I actually have enough information that says it goes on the [potential recall] docket? Then how do I have enough information to make a compelling case to convince an executive panel that they really should spend thirty million dollars on a recall?”

As Gladwell explains, engineers and regulators often look at reports of defects from a very different angle than the general public (which can be heavily influenced by sensationalized news coverage). There is no such thing as a perfectly safe vehicle – every design choice made by an automobile manufacturer needs to balance vehicle safety against other considerations, such as cost. Gladwell zeroes in on the Ford Pinto cases in the early 1970s, when Ford was indicted in connection with a rear-collision accident that had resulted in the deaths of three teen-aged passengers. Although the prosecutor in that case argued that the design of the fuel tank was defective, Gladwell points out (and the jury ultimately was persuaded) that the Pinto design was not materially different in this regard from that of other compact cars of that era. While everyone remembers the Ford Pinto cases and associates that brand with unsafe defects, the data from that era confirms that the Pinto was no more or less safe than its peers. The public responds to sensationalized media coverage; engineers focus solely on the facts and data available to them. The question of whether a product is “safe” may depend upon whom you ask.

Gladwell’s analysis also serves as a reminder of the importance of public relations and crisis management when companies are faced with high profile issues or lawsuits.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights