Budget Bill Aims to Kill Any New Off-Campus Provider-Based Facilities

28 October 2015 Health Care Law Today Blog
Author(s): Anil Shankar Lawrence W. Vernaglia


Legislation being drafted as part of a budget deal between members of Congress and the White House includes language that will significantly alter the future of hospital-based outpatient care. The “discussion draft” of the bipartisan budget agreement would exclude from Medicare’s outpatient hospital prospective payment system (“OPPS”) any new off-campus departments of a hospital, as determined by Medicare’s provider-based standards, unless it is an emergency department. 

The legislation grandfathers any off-campus departments of a hospital that have billed Medicare under the OPPS prior to the date of the legislation’s enactment, allowing them to continue to be reimbursed under the OPPS. Medicare reimbursement for non-grandfathered off-campus hospital departments may be available under other payment systems, such as the physician fee schedule or the ambulatory surgery center prospective payment system, which are generally lower than the OPPS.

Federal groups, including the Medicare Payment and Access Commission (“MEDPAC”) and the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”), have advocated reducing rates paid to certain hospital outpatient departments for years, arguing that the same services can sometimes be performed safely in a lower-cost physician office. In 2014, MEDPAC recommended that Congress reduce or eliminate differences in payment rates between hospital outpatient departments and physician offices for selected ambulatory payment classifications. The legislative language would apply the change to all ambulatory payment classifications, other than those provided in grandfathered facilities. Similar legislation has been proposed in the past, but never succeeded; this time there is momentum and not enough warning for providers to build effective coalitions to galvanize opposition.

Key Takeaways

If enacted, this provision will significantly alter the willingness of hospitals to acquire off-campus clinical settings and convert them to provider-based hospital departments, as doing so would impose all the overhead of a hospital-based department, but at the lower rates available to a freestanding, often unregulated, facility.

If any hospitals have recently established an off-campus outpatient department, they should move quickly to get the facility operational as soon as possible, so that they may submit a bill to Medicare prior to the enactment of the new law.  In appropriate cases, it may be possible to submit a place-holder bill if it is done in a legally compliant and transparent fashion.

This is a highly fluid issue. Hospitals and health systems should be working directly with their trade associations and delegations to make sure that they are aware of and responsive to these developments. Members of Foley’s Health Care & Government Affairs practice have been advising clients on this development.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services