Exclusion for Qualified Small Business Stock

20 September 2016 Technology Transactions Today Blog
Authors: Jordan J. Bergmann Jason J. Kohout Timothy L. Voigtman

The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act, passed in December 2015, extended an often overlooked provision of the tax code with the potential to provide significant savings to small business owners and non-corporate investors.  Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code permits the seller of a “qualified small business” to exclude up to 100% of the gain attributable to the sale or exchange of qualified small business stock from taxation.

Stock must have the following characteristics to be eligible for exclusion as “qualified small business stock” (QSBS):

  1. The stock must be originally issued by a “qualified small business”.
  2. The taxpayer must have acquired the stock at its original issue in exchange for money, property, or as compensation for services provided to the corporation.
  3. During the time the taxpayer owns the stock, at least 80% of the corporation’s assets must be used in the active conduct of one or more qualified businesses.
  4. The corporation must be an “eligible corporation” within the meaning of the statute.
  5. The corporation must not have redeemed more than a de minimus amount of stock from the taxpayer (or certain related parties) during the four-year period beginning two-years prior to the issuance of stock to the taxpayer.

A “qualified small business” means a domestic “C Corporation” that did not have aggregate assets in excess of $50 million through and immediately following the issuance of the QSBS.  To meet the active business requirement, the corporation can generally operate any active trade or business other than certain excluded businesses.  Examples of excluded businesses include service businesses such as health, law and engineering, financial businesses such as banking, insurance and financing, and certain other businesses such as farming, mining and operating hotels or restaurants.

Sellers of QSBS held for more than five years may be eligible to exclude 50%, 75% or even 100% of their gain at sale.  QSBS acquired after September 27, 2010 is eligible for the 100% exclusion.  QSBS acquired before February 18, 2009 is eligible for a 50% exclusion; while stock acquired after February 18, 2009 but before September 27, 2010 eligible for a 75% exclusion.  The excluded gain is, however, limited to the greater of $10 million or ten (10) times the taxpayer’s adjusted basis in the QSBS.

If used correctly, the QSBS exclusion can provide a valuable tool for small businesses and investors.  As capital gains rates rise, tax efficient exit strategies become increasingly important for business owners to consider.

Kurt Belongea, Banker, J.P. Morgan Private Bank in Milwaukee points out, there is potential for a non-grantor irrevocable trust to claim its own $10 million QSBS gain exclusion (separate from grantor’s gain exclusion, potentially enhancing tax savings and wealth transfer strategies1 when:

  1. The transferee of QSBS obtained by gift or bequest is treated as having acquired the stock in the same manner as the transferor and can tack the transferor’s holding period
  2. Same result should apply if gift was originally made to an irrevocable grantor trust whose grantor trust status terminated prior to sale of the QSBS
  3. Irrevocable trust drafting consideration: if goal is to maximize the $10 million QSBS gain exclusion, the grantor could make gifts to separate non-grantor irrevocable trusts for the benefit of different children, family members, etc. versus making a gift to a single pot trust, so as to maximize the number of separate taxpayers able to claim the $10 million gain exclusion

—————————————————–
1 It is important to consult your outside tax advisor to independently determine its technical merits.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ