Texas Legislator Proposes Bill to Protect Workers’ “Political Beliefs”

06 March 2017 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

Last week, Representative James White, a Republican representing District 19 (Hardin, Jasper, Newton, Polk, and Tyler Counties), proposed a new state law that would protect Texas workers from adverse actions for expressing their political opinions and views away from the job.  The key provision of the proposed legislation defines “political beliefs” to include “only” those beliefs of an individual “expressed outside the workplace and outside the course and scope of the individual’s employment.”  The proposed legislation, if passed, would modify the Texas Labor Code by making “political beliefs” a protected class, alongside “race, color, disability, religion, sex, national origin, or age.”  Tex. Lab. Code § 21.051.  You may read the proposed text of the legislation here.

Previously on the Work Knowledge Blog, we outlined some issues for employers to consider when it comes to politics in the workplace, especially during or immediately following election years.  Here are links to those posts:

(1) Voting Leave Rights

(2) Free Speech in the Workplace

(3) Drafting and Implementing Employment Policies

(4) Mistakes to Avoid in Employee Handbooks

One of the key things we identified in those prior posts was that the First Amendment’s right of free speech does not apply to private employers and that employers in Texas should protect their employees from unlawful harassment, even if it occurs on social media.  Indeed, even the Texas Workforce Commission recognizes that “courts have long held employers responsible if they fail to take effective action with respect to employees who commit illegal harassment against co-workers, whether the harassment occurs on- or off-duty.”  Tex. Workforce Comm’n., Social Media Issues, available here (emphasis added).  Thus, employers might have some liability in Texas if they do nothing about an employee who uses their “political beliefs” to harass a coworker (e.g., a Caucasian worker harasses a Hispanic coworker regarding Trump’s proposal to build a border wall).

On its face, the proposed legislation does not impede on an employer’s ability to take adverse actions against employees who harass their coworkers with their political beliefs.  But it would seem to pit one worker’s right to express a “political belief” to a coworker outside of work hours (e.g., on a social media forum) against another worker’s right to be free from harassment.  The proposed legislation therefore may create a number of issues for employers, if it passes, due to the competing interests of their employees.

That said, a couple of things about the proposed legislation are clear.  If it passes, and therefore makes “political beliefs” a protected class in Texas, the primary changes employers would need to make are twofold.  First, employers would need to review and/or revise their employment policies and handbooks to ensure they have included the correct statement of current Texas law regarding discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.  Second, employers would need to ensure that future adverse actions against employees are unrelated to their “political beliefs” as that phrase is defined in the proposed legislation and as affected by other laws and employee rights.

If you have any questions about this proposed legislation or about your obligations as a Texas employer, call an attorney with an appropriate employment law background.


This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services