Time to Review Internal Confidentiality Agreements

03 April 2017 Dashboard Insights Blog
Authors: Erin L. Toomey

There’s not a whole lot of new ground to cover as to why an employer or contractor would want to implement confidentiality agreements. However, forcing them on workers is a whole different story.

Federal government contractors are now prohibited from requiring employees or subcontractors to sign an internal confidentiality agreement that restricts them from lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or abuse to designated investigative or law enforcement representatives of a Federal department or agency authorized to receive such information (e.g., agency Office of the Inspector General). This went into effect January 19, 2017, pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements. Pursuant to FAR clause 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements – Representation, by submitting an offer to the federal government, contractors represent that they are compliant with the requirements of FAR clause 52.203-19.

To comply with these new requirements, all federal government contractors should:

  • Review existing employee and subcontractor confidentiality agreements;
  • If existing confidentiality agreements are found to contain language that is inconsistent with the new rule, prepare an appropriate notification to employees and subcontractors that the prohibitions and restrictions in the confidentiality agreement that are inconsistent with the clause, are no longer in effect; and
  • Revise confidentiality agreement templates and draft future confidentiality agreements to ensure compliance with the new rule.

This new rule, available here, applies to all solicitations and contracts (including contracts for commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items) that use fiscal year 2015 funds or subsequent fiscal year funds, that do not already contain a comparable provision/clause. Additionally, higher-tiered contractors must include FAR clause 52.203-19 in all lower-tier subcontracts.

If you have any questions about how to comply with these new requirements, please contact Erin Toomey or your Foley attorney.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services