The Sharing Economy: Ride Sharing Provides Unique Challenges to Automotive Manufacturers Going Forward

17 July 2017 Dashboard Insights Blog

A recent study published by AlixPartners estimates that for each car-sharing vehicle on the road, 32 personal vehicle purchases do not occur, which to date has resulted in 500,000 missed vehicle sales for automotive manufacturers. AlixPartners estimates that by 2020, automakers will miss out on an additional 1.2 million vehicle sales as a result of ride sharing systems as they begin to mature nationwide. As of 2016, 6 million people worldwide were using some form of shared-vehicle transportation and its projected that could grow to 30 million people by 2020.

Survey respondents indicated “ease of access, convenience and economics” were primary reasons to utilize car-sharing over ownership. Although environmentalism has often been picked as a driving motivator for the use of ride-sharing systems, it was not found to be an influential factor among survey participants. The survey found that 51 percent of participants avoided vehicle purchases due to car sharing and 45 percent of participants will likely avoid future purchase of personal vehicles. In an unsurprising fashion, the survey found the decision to not purchase a personal vehicle was highest among younger consumers but surprisingly, also highest among households with children – both presenting future issues for the auto industry.

While Zipcar (owned by Avis since 2013) has been the U.S. market leader for ride sharing since launching in 1999, major automotive manufacturers and rental-car agencies have started to enter the market as consumers’ sentiment begins to trend away from personal-vehicle ownership. General Motors, Ford, BMW, Enterprise, and Avis have found ways to utilize their extensive fleets of vehicles and nation-wide footprint to expand their brand and product utilization in this rapidly changing transit landscape. While smartphones and rapidly increasing urban density have driven ride-sharing adoption up until this point, many believe the rapid expansion of automated and driverless cars could be a key catalyst for car-sharing to grow well beyond the current early-adopters.

In January 2016, General Motors Corporation launched its Zipcar competitor, Maven, in 8 markets around the United States and has slowly expanded to 13 cities with over 35,000 members. Since launching, Maven has logged over 145 million miles driven by Maven customers and General Motors has expanded its fleet to include the Chevy Bolt EV, Suburban, and Malibu in numerous markets. Additionally, General Motors has invested over $500 million into Uber competitor, Lyft, and used Lyft to set up Maven Gig which offers special pricing to “gig economy workers as a way to easily gain access to a vehicle for short stints to do things like deliver groceries and food on demand, and provide ride sharing services.”

In a different move, Ford Motor Company announced in 2016 the acquisition of Chariot Transit Inc. via its subsidiary Ford Smart Mobility. Chariot is a commuter shuttle service which utilizes a mobile-phone application to allow passengers to reserve rides on a shuttle between home and work during commuting hours in the San Francisco Bay region. Additionally, in 2017 Ford launched the Ford GoBike, a bike sharing system in San Francisco with 7,000 bikes and over 400 docking stations making it the second largest bike sharing system in the United States.

While Uber, Lyft, Google’s Waymo, General Motors, and Ford see automation coming together with ride sharing for their cars and the day-to-day driver, the University of Michigan announced that the 2017 school year will see the launch of two fully-automated, 15-passenger, all-electric shuttles. The goal of these shuttles is to transport students, faculty, and staff between UM’s Engineering campus, which is located on North Campus, and the university’s North Campus Research Complex. With Ann Arbor, Michigan and the surrounding Detroit Metropolitan area positioning itself to be the connected and autonomous transit development hub of the country, this move by the University of Michigan in relation to its larger-scale Mcity autonomous project provides a unique opportunity for automotive manufacturers and suppliers to see how the mix of ride sharing and autonomous vehicles will shape the commuting landscape in the coming years.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.