Senate Votes to Roll Back Auto Industry Lending Guidance from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

23 April 2018 Dashboard Insights Blog
Author(s): Lauren M. Loew

On April 18, the Senate narrowly passed a resolution to roll back certain guidance issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2013 pertaining to auto lending. As previously written about on a Foley & Lardner LLP blog, the CFPB issued the specific guidance through a bulletin regarding compliance with fair lending requirements for auto lenders involved in indirect lending.

The guidance addressed circumstances where buyers sought financing through the auto dealer.  Potential indirect auto lenders would provide a minimum interest rate, and in some instances, provide the ability for dealers to mark up the interest rate or otherwise adjust the interest rate (known as a “dealer reserve”). The CFPB bulletin stated this practice ran “a significant risk that they will result in pricing disparities on the basis of race, national origin, and potentially other prohibited bases.” The guidance suggested the indirect auto lenders limit or eliminate the dealer discretion.

As a result of the guidance, some lenders eliminated the discretionary markups. However, dealers said the guidance made it more difficult to offer consumer discounts, in fear of claims of discrimination. Others in the auto industry raised concerns about the lack of clarity in the bulletin, as well as how and when the guidance would be enforced.  The effort to roll back the guidance included significant support from certain industry groups, and opposition from certain consumer groups.

The measure now goes to the House, where it is expected to pass.  The White House has also indicated support for the measure.  Although the resolution would roll back the CFPB guidance, it does not change any existing fair lending laws or regulations, or the ability of the CFPB to enforce fair lending laws.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services