European Commission Releases First Proposals for Truck CO2 Standards; Truck Industry Reacts

On May 17, 2018, the European Commission released a legislative proposal for the first ever CO₂ emissions standards for heavy duty vehicles in the European Union. The EU has no current limits on CO₂ emissions from heavy duty trucks, which according to Reuters “make up a quarter of all road transport emissions while making up just 5 percent of vehicles on the road.”

The Commission proposed a two-step approach:

in 2025, a mandatory reduction in CO₂ emissions by 15% from 2019, and
in 2030, a proposed reduction in CO₂ emissions by 30% from 2019.

The original reductions would apply to large trucks, which according to the Commission account for 65% to 70% of all CO₂ emissions from heavy-duty vehicles. The Commission would review the 2030 reduction target in 2022, and at that time, would also extend the scope to include small trucks, busses, coaches, and trailers.

To meet the standards, the proposal includes various methods of implementation. Manufacturers will work to meet the reductions through a combination of emissions reduction, emissions credits, and investment in innovative technologies. This includes:

“Banking and borrowing to take account of long production cycles, including a reward for early action, while maintaining the environmental integrity of the targets.”
“Full flexibility for manufacturers to balance emissions between the different groups of vehicles within their portfolio.”
“Vocational vehicles, such as garbage trucks and construction vehicles, are exempted due to their limited potential for cost-efficient CO₂”

The Commission included an incentive system which will “reward those manufacturers who will invest more in innovative technologies.”

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA”) reacted to the proposal on Thursday. ACEA members include BMW, DAF, Daimler, FCA, Ford, Honda, Hyundai, Iveco, Jaguar Land Rover, PSA Groupe, Groupe Renault, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo.

ACEA praised certain aspects of the proposal: a two-step approach to emissions, a uniform baseline (2019 emissions) and a uniform calculation tool (VECTO) to report CO₂ emissions.

However, ACEA raised concerns about the Commission’s “aggressive” approach and the application of CO₂ reduction levels from passenger vehicles to heavy duty vehicles. The ACEA secretary said this approach does not “fully recognis[e] the fundamental differences between these vehicle segments.” Further, the ACEA pushed back on the 2025 target, saying this is not realistic for vehicle development. ACEA had pushed for a 7 percent reduction by 2025 and a 16 percent reduction by 2030.

Other environmental groups said the proposed reductions do not go far enough. The organization Transport & Environment welcomed the proposal but said “the Commission’s plan falls short of the ambition demanded by hauliers and businesses and what’s needed to hit EU’s own climate goals”—namely, zero emissions from transportation by 2050.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.