Auto Sales in China Reverse Trend in June

11 July 2019 Dashboard Insights Blog
Authors: Lauren M. Loew

Preliminary numbers indicate auto sales in China rose in June, reversing course for the first time in a year.  Sales rose a reported 4.9% in June.  As previously discussed on the blog, sales in China have been in a downward trend since last summer.

Analysts attribute the rise to aggressive discounting by dealers in China.  One of the underlying reasons for the discounts is an attempt by dealers to clear their lots of cars that do not meet new stricter emissions standards.  The rules, which were originally slated to take effect in July 2020, have been pulled forward to this month in at least 15 cities, creating a rush to comply with the emissions standards.  Dealers lamented that buyers did not want to buy the vehicles certified to the prior emissions standards, unsure of how long they would be able to drive the vehicles.  However, the steep discounting must have worked, given the surge in vehicle sales in June.  Reports indicated discounts as big as 50% to entice buyers to the dealers.

The new standards require cuts of 30% to emissions.  The cities that have pulled the standards forward account for two thirds of car sales, so the timeline acceleration has required a significant shift in car sales.

Although auto sales as a whole rose, US automakers continued to face rough patches in China.  Ford continued its slide of auto sales in China.  Second quarter sales fell 21.7%, far less than the 35% fall in the first quarter.  

As new emissions vehicles (NEVs) hit the lots, the fate of China’s auto market remains in the air.  However, the full year outlook continues to indicate a down year overall for the auto industry in China.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.