California Governor Signs New Telehealth Insurance Law

18 October 2019 Health Care Law Today Blog
Authors: Nathaniel M. Lacktman

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new law requiring commercial health insurance coverage and payment parity for telehealth services. The law will benefit patients by increasing access and availability to healthcare services, and catalyze the growth of telehealth technologies throughout California. California is representative of a growing national trend of states across the country either enacting new telehealth insurance coverage and payment parity laws, or revisiting their older laws to revise and improve them to better account for the current state of telehealth.

Changes to California’s Telehealth Insurance Coverage Law

California’s prior telehealth coverage law did not include a payment parity provision requiring health plans to pay providers at the same or equivalent rate providers are paid for identical in-person services. The new bill makes some technical modifications to current law, but most notably creates two new statutes – Health & Safety Code section 1374.14 and Insurance Code section 10123.855.  The key changes in the new law are:

  • Under health plan participation agreements, the plan “shall reimburse the treating or consulting health care provider for the diagnosis, consultation, or treatment of an enrollee or subscriber appropriately delivered through telehealth services on the same basis and to the same extent that the health care service plan is responsible for reimbursement for the same service through in-person diagnosis, consultation, or treatment.”
  • Health plans and providers can continue to negotiate reimbursement rates under their participation agreements. However, services that the same, as determined by the provider’s description of the service on the claim, must be reimbursed at the same rate whether provided in-person or through telehealth.
  • The law does not require telehealth reimbursement to be unbundled from other capitated or bundled, risk-based payments.
  • Traditional providers using telehealth, including facilities and health systems, pushed to ensure the law prohibited narrow networking for telehealth services, i.e. no exclusive contracts for telehealth companies (“coverage shall not be limited only to services delivered by select third-party corporate telehealth providers”).While exclusive arrangements are not allowed, the law does not require a health plan to cover telehealth services if provided by an out-of-network provider, unless coverage is required under other provisions of law.
  • A health plan may charge a deductible, copayment or coinsurance for a health care service delivered via telemedicine if it does not exceed the deductible, copayment or coinsurance applicable to a service delivered via in-person consultation or contact.
  • The law applies to contracts starting or renewed on or after January 1, 2021.

These changes were intended to fix statutory shortcomings that confused practitioners and ultimately prevented patients from enjoying meaningful insurance coverage of services delivered via telehealth. A number of other state legislatures are considering similar amendments to their current telehealth coverage laws in order to close these perceived loopholes and give patients and healthcare providers clarity on what medical services are (and are not) covered when delivered via telehealth.

With the enactment of the new California law, approximately 36 states plus D.C. have laws requiring commercial health insurance plans to cover telehealth services, and approximately eleven of those states have payment parity language. We will continue to monitor for any legislative changes that affect or improve telemedicine opportunities.

Want to learn more?

Join us for a deeper discussion of state telehealth laws, as well as Foley’s Health Care Industry cocktail reception at the Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting in Phoenix, AZ on October 27-30, 2019.

For more information on telemedicine, telehealth, virtual care, remote patient monitoring, digital health, and other health innovations, including the team, publications, and representative experience, visit Foley’s Telemedicine & Digital Health Industry Team.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Will Other Tech Companies Join Microsoft in Honoring CCPA Across the U.S.?
18 November 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Get Off My Lawn! Employers Gain Expanded Rights to Keep Unions Away from Their Property
18 November 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Debunking Conventional Labor and Employment Wisdom
18 November 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Racing to Innovate: The OESA’s 2019 Industry Outlook Panel
14 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call