2020 Automotive Update: State of the Market, Cost Recovery, and Market Disruption Opportunities

20 February 2020 Dashboard Insights Blog

On February 4, 2020, Ann Marie Uetz of Foley & Lardner LLP and Laura Marcero of Huron Consulting Group co-hosted a presentation featuring Michael Robinet, Executive Director at IHS Markit Automotive Advisory, to provide insights on the state of the automotive market. More than one hundred automotive executives, professionals and lenders participated. Here are the highlights:

Light Vehicle Outlook: Industry at a Crossroads

Keynote speaker Michael Robinet discussed the move toward vehicle electrification, and the immense differences between conventional, hybrid, and battery electric vehicles (“BEVs”). A conventional vehicle uses an internal combustion engine for propulsion, without assistance from an electric motor. Through the implementation of start/stop technology, OEs have been able to defer investments in full electrification while still responding in part to increased fuel-economy requirements. Nonetheless, many OEs also manufacture multi-energy vehicles, such as mild-hybrid or full-hybrid vehicles, which use a combination of gasoline and electricity to power the engine. Finally, Michael discussed the gold standard of vehicle electrification—BEVs, which are fully electric vehicles with rechargeable batteries and no gasoline engine. From a structural standpoint, the parts, modules, and technology necessary to assemble conventional vehicles, hybrids, and BEVs are radically different, and thus the ultimate move toward BEVs will impact the supplier market as it adjusts to meet this demand.

Currently, the automotive markets in China and Europe are on the leading edge of vehicle electrification, and both are at least five years ahead of the United States according to Mr. Robinet. In the European Union, mild-hybrid vehicles are expected to surpass start/stop engines in the near future. Additionally, China, a country that accounts for nearly 50% of future growth, currently purchases half the world’s BEVs. GM sells more vehicles in China than any other country, and many other OEs do an enormous amount of business in the Asian market, devoting significant resources to vehicle electrification. Michael commented on OEs’ future focus on electrification, as opposed to new launches of conventional engines and powertrains.

To be sure, the progression toward electrification poses serious challenges for traditional automotive suppliers. Nonetheless, for those suppliers willing to adapt, Michael noted the evolution toward vehicle electrification in overseas markets creates a significant source of opportunity. Moreover, suppliers that quickly find a niche in the hybrid or BEV space will secure a more certain future. He noted that vehicle electrification will eventually become more prevalent across the United States, particularly on the coasts and within large metropolitan areas. Thus, although consumer demand for vehicle electrification within the United States is still evolving, and the infrastructure needed to accommodate a large-scale shift away from conventional vehicles is far from complete, the progression is inevitable according to Mr. Robinet.

Panel Discussion: Concerns and Opportunities in a Changing Environment

Foley partners Ann Marie Uetz and Vanessa Miller, and Huron Managing Director Laura Marcero, participated in a panel discussion moderated by John Trentacosta regarding industry concerns and opportunities in a changing and at times distressed environment.

Ann Marie discussed the importance of monitoring suppliers for warning signs of distress, including missed shipments, late payments, quality issues, etc. If issues persist, companies should conduct due diligence and investigate suppliers to determine their level of risk. Ann Marie further noted that when a commercial relationship goes south, the end goal for all involved is typically the same – to maintain continuity of supply. Laura concurred, stating that, more often than not, the distressed supplier has very little leverage and finds itself shut out of negotiations. Instead, the lender and customer drive the negotiations to reach a favorable outcome. Ann Marie and Laura stated in their experience, customers are typically willing to accommodate a distressed supplier in some fashion. After all, it is in neither parties’ interest to shut down the supply chain and turn a $1 million issue into a $20 million problem.

The discussion then shifted to the intersection of two massive industries: technology and automotive. Vanessa and John, whose practices include a focus on warranty and cost recovery in the supply chain, discussed the incorporation of advanced technologies into vehicles and the significant issues related to cybersecurity and data privacy which have resulted. Indeed, some argue that cars have become the most significant computers that many of us own, filled with hundreds of sensors. As such, how are companies handling all of this data, and who is responsible for the associated risk?  Vanessa stated the answers to these questions are more relevant than ever. In the summer of 2018, California enacted a statute intended to enhance privacy rights and consumer protections. Thereafter, in 2019, dozens of states introduced similar legislation. Thus, the introduction of technology into the automotive supply chain will require companies to navigate a complex web of data laws. Warranty issues will also become increasingly complex. Accordingly, it is imperative companies allocate risk through thoughtful contractual provisions and unambiguous specifications and requirements. 

The keynote presentation and panel discussion provided prominent members from the automotive and financial sectors helpful insights into market trends and emerging issues. To view the 2020 Automotive Update: State of the Market, Cost Recovery, and Market Disruption Opportunities program materials, click here.

Foley and Huron look forward to hosting this annual event again in early 2021.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services