Reducing Employee Hours v. Layoffs: A Texas Alternative
07 April 2020
Blog
Authors:
Cristina Portela Solomon
Like most employers worldwide facing economic difficulties, Texas employers are struggling with the issue of how to avoid massive layoffs. The Texas Workforce Commission Shared Work Program is one example of a solution that allows an employer to reduce an employee’s hours, as opposed to laying off its employees, while permitting affected employees to collect a portion of unemployment benefits.
Here’s how it works:
- The employees’ hours must be reduced not less than 10%, and no more than 40%;
- An employer can have different reductions for different employees or departments, but the employer’s plan must apply to at least 10% of the employees in the particular unit that is affected by the plan;
- Because the Shared Work Program is an alternative to laying off employees, an employer must provide the TWC with an estimate of the number of employees who would be laid off, if the employer had not participated in the program;
- The employer must continue to provide the same employee benefits to employees as it was providing before the reduction in hours;
- The TWC will pay shared work employees partial unemployment benefits to supplement the wages lost to working reduced hours.
The TWC Users’ Guide for the Shared Work Program outlines the requirements and benefits of the program, and provides a link to the TWC website where an employer can submit its plan.
Texas is not alone in offering a shared work program. Currently, over 25 states have some form of program that permits employees to receive a portion of unemployment benefits while still remaining employed at a reduced schedule. Each state’s program differs, and employers who are interested in taking advantage of this option should review the relevant states’ unemployment agency sites and consult with legal counsel for further information.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Authors
Related Services
Practice Areas
Insights
DOL Rolls Back Trump Administration’s Independent Contractor Rule
05 May 2021
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
190 Across the Finish Line: CFTC Adopts New Bankruptcy Rules for FCMS and DCOS
05 May 2021
The Journal on the Law of Investment & Risk Management Products, Futures & Derivatives Law Report
Understanding SPACs' Hidden Capital Costs
05 May 2021
Law360
The Export Import Bank of the United States: Priorities and Programs Supporting U.S. Businesses and Jobs
04 May 2021
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Represents Take Command Health in The Closing of Its $12M Series A Funding Round
29 April 2021
Risman Discusses Hotel Industry’s Cash Crunch and Unique Routes to Recovery
26 April 2021
HOTELS Magazine
Home Care 100
27-30 June 2021
Marco Island, FL
2021 AANP National Conference
15 June - 31 August 2021
Virtual Conference
HCCA Orange County Regional Healthcare Compliance Conference
11 June 2021
Virtual Conference
Rx Pricing and Reimbursement Summit
24-25 May 2021
Virtual Conference